Straight to the point.
A lot of Player Faction Articles here are in need of a revamp. We've noticed that many of them are incomplete, lack proper formatting/templates/images, written in an OoRP manner, or are otherwise not up to standard.
For Example: Articles such as
http://discoveryfl.com/wiki/index.php?titl...ayer_faction%29
http://discoveryfl.com/wiki/index.php?titl...ayer_faction%29
and http://discoveryfl.com/wiki/index.php?titl...k_Nile_Squadron
Are examples of the types of issues with OoRP and Incomplete Content.
What we're looking for is more akin to
http://discoveryfl.com/wiki/index.php?titl...ayer_faction%29
http://discoveryfl.com/wiki/index.php?title=Aoi_Iseijin
http://discoveryfl.com/wiki/index.php?title=Consortium
In terms of inRP historical information, formatting, and relevant information. This should apply to both official factions and articles on unofficial groups.
Faction/Group Leaders and Members should look into revamping articles more regularly and keeping information fresh. If not the leaders themselves, have some ranking members take care of it. Everything should ideally be done in an in-depth and concise manner, with as little OoRP as possible (necessary OoRP segments should be marked).
Again, just a friendly reminder (READ: You're all on the list) to check your factions' articles and update/expand/fix as necessary.
~Watsas
