+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch (/showthread.php?tid=129569)
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - Wesker - 05-19-2015
#discocourtsystembestcourtsystem
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - nOmnomnOm - 05-19-2015
Jump drives should be srped or monitored to make sure it isn't abused. Reports of abuse should be then delt with to remove lolwut abuse.
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - Wesker - 05-19-2015
Put SRP on them I guess I could live with that.
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - Highland Laddie - 05-19-2015
So using them to escape a fight (ANY fight) is bad? Or is it just using them to jump out AND back into a fight is bad?
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - nOmnomnOm - 05-19-2015
I would say the toxic would be out and then back.
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - Wesker - 05-19-2015
(05-19-2015, 06:33 PM)Highland Laddie Wrote: So using them to escape a fight (ANY fight) is bad? Or is it just using them to jump out AND back into a fight is bad?
Both
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - WesternPeregrine - 05-19-2015
Jumping out of combat should be treated the same as an unintended disconnect from combat. If the player returns to the sector, he should have the courtesy of not entering the battle again, unless a new engagement occurs between the his and the enemy forces (first combat is finished).
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - Alley - 05-19-2015
(05-19-2015, 06:53 PM)WPeregrine Wrote: Jumping out of combat should be treated the same as an unintended disconnect from combat. If the player returns to the sector, he should have the courtesy of not entering the battle again, unless a new engagement occurs between the his and the enemy forces (first combat is finished).
Not necessarily. The lack of counter is the big problem here.
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - nOmnomnOm - 05-19-2015
(05-19-2015, 06:53 PM)WPeregrine Wrote: Jumping out of combat should be treated the same as an unintended disconnect from combat. If the player returns to the sector, he should have the courtesy of not entering the battle again, unless a new engagement occurs between the his and the enemy forces (first combat is finished).
it should be treated as a docking death
RE: Temporary Suggestion: Make CDs disrupt JDs until the next patch - Highland Laddie - 05-19-2015
(05-19-2015, 06:58 PM)Alley Wrote:(05-19-2015, 06:53 PM)WPeregrine Wrote: Jumping out of combat should be treated the same as an unintended disconnect from combat. If the player returns to the sector, he should have the courtesy of not entering the battle again, unless a new engagement occurs between the his and the enemy forces (first combat is finished).
Not necessarily. The lack of counter is the big problem here.
Exactly. Once people actually have the JD disruptor...they'll make all them JD BSs very sorry they sacrificed armor for a disruptable escape. That being said..and going back to the OP's point - making CDs the "anti-all" in the interim isn't really a good thing.