+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Forum: Faction Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=46)
+---- Thread: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's (/showthread.php?tid=135010)
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - Findarato Veneanar - 01-27-2016
(01-27-2016, 01:09 PM)Toris Wrote: - Make scrap field around Rochester too tight for actual caps and bigger transports.The junkers building a kind of scrap wall around roch might even be legit inrp.
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - Skorak - 01-27-2016
Maybe it wouldn't even need to be "them" building a wall but it is something that naturally happens? And they like it because it provides additional cover.
By naturally I mean: Junkers bring scrap to roch. And so more and more piles up.
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - The Savage - 01-27-2016
(01-27-2016, 01:34 PM)Skorak Wrote: Junkers bring scrap to roch. And so more and more piles up.
Hell, they are scrap hoarders. I'm amused Rochester doesn't look like one bigarse piece if scrap.
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - sindroms - 01-27-2016
Most of this nonsense would not be a problem if avoiding consequences was not negated for 2 mil credits.
Remember when we had to purchase renaming cards for 250 mil if we wanted to get away with upsetting some group?
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - RicoValesquez - 01-27-2016
So here's what this conversation has turned into:
-Junkers need to move Rochester way away from any usable lanes or bases or build a "Junk wall" so no large ships can possibly dock there.
and
-Junkers are a non-essential presence that the government could eradicate out of house space if needed, any helpful role that junkers play is completely negated by corporations that scrap.
This is pretty silly if you ask me.
All the original intent of this thread was to do was to set some precedence regarding who important it is for the governing faction of Rochester base to comply to law enforcement demands regarding restricting the docking privileges of said criminals with a full on rep-hack. Hence the title.
If you want to spout non-sense that is not directly related to this issue please start your own thread to do it.
Rico
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - nOmnomnOm - 01-27-2016
Also i wonder who here that was talking about a junk wall or what not actually has played in depth a junker character.
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - RicoValesquez - 01-27-2016
Joined:
11-11-2015
not played much at all
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - Skorak - 01-27-2016
You guys need to see further than your own keyboard.
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - nOmnomnOm - 01-27-2016
(01-27-2016, 11:11 AM)Skorak Wrote: I also suggest increasing the distance between Rochester and the lanes more. Both parties shouldn't be able to run so easily anymore. Maybe further away in the field or move it to one of the other fields? They are so underused anyways.
and also plays LPI- so this proposal is totally working in your favor hmm?
RE: Liberty forcing Junker fr5's - RicoValesquez - 01-27-2016
(01-27-2016, 09:00 PM)Skorak Wrote: You guys need to see further than your own keyboard.
You need to do your job and moderate this thread because it has gone way off topic. This isn't flood this is rules.