+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Inter-House (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+----- Forum: A/)- Technocracy of Auxo (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+----- Thread: Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=142072)
RE: A/) - Feedback - Shaggy - 03-04-2020
So surely you should have checked who is friendly. allied and hostile with before hand to refreshed yourself before hand?
That's not really a reason or a way to justify why that player broke their id especially if the faction was warned for it previously.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Lucas - 03-04-2020
-Can attack any ship in self-defense, to protect an allied or friendly ship, or in defense of bases belonging to friendly or allied factions.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Enkidu - 03-04-2020
Oh, so that's why they built a base enormously off the plane.
Can we avoid gaming the ID system to complete InRp objectives? People are doing it a lot lately. Discovery is full of little exploits that break the game if we indulge in them.
RE: A/) - Feedback - SnakThree - 03-04-2020
No GM oversight when it comes changing such factions diplomacy is odd when houses have to go through approval to get laws changes. Low and poor form.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Lythrilux - 03-04-2020
Not the first time Auxesia diplomacy has inexplicably come under strain when it comes to shooting something. Best solution may be to request an ID change to keep things dynamic if needed. Or remove the 'unlawful actions' thing from the ID if it's there.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Shiki - 03-04-2020
I don't see a problem if faction managing it's diplomacy the way they see fit. Especially when it's Freelancer based factions who are limited at many things for the sake of flexibility.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 03-04-2020
(03-04-2020, 09:31 AM)Riehl Wrote: Oh, so that's why they built a base enormously off the plane.
Can we avoid gaming the ID system to complete InRp objectives? People are doing it a lot lately. Discovery is full of little exploits that break the game if we indulge in them.
Thing is, I thought I hit save to the edit over a year ago but it turns out I didn't lmao. I don't particularly have any strings attached to Discovery because I have other and greater commitments to attend to, such as doing actual game development and animation.
I shouldn't need to mingle with the forums all the freaking time if I want to pop into the game and interact with people, or help someone out who we've helped before. Not to mention, we did kinda say we'd give a defensive hand. Don't want to go shooting people first.
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=177032
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=177282
RE: A/) - Feedback - Dhomie42 - 03-04-2020
(03-04-2020, 04:25 PM)Auzari Wrote: Not to mention, we did kinda say we'd give a defensive hand. Don't want to go shooting people first.
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=177032
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=177282
You encountered us at the Texas Gate in Bering, nowhere near that new PoB whatsoever, there weren't even any RHA present, so that's not exactly justification.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 03-04-2020
(03-04-2020, 05:13 PM)Dhomie42 Wrote:incorrect(03-04-2020, 04:25 PM)Auzari Wrote: Not to mention, we did kinda say we'd give a defensive hand. Don't want to go shooting people first.
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=177032
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=177282
You encountered us at the Texas Gate in Bering, nowhere near that new PoB whatsoever, there weren't even any RHA present, so that's not exactly justification.
you were in bering deciding to jump one lonely LH.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Groshyr - 03-04-2020
These links are 404