+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Inter-House (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+----- Forum: A/)- Technocracy of Auxo (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+----- Thread: Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=142072)
RE: A/) - Feedback - Vendetta - 01-16-2017
(01-16-2017, 11:24 PM)Divine Wrote: Alright. Nyx explained a lot on Skype and with what Vendetta said and linked here, it's a good start for me to figure this out. It's great to see you actually try to RP your supply-lines, I was curious about that.
As a suggestion, maybe you should have a dedicated thread in your subforum that just links to those supply-deals for easier reference and to see where the Aux actually has supplies lying around or support going on.
We actually planned to set up the logistics section but our logistics people all left the server for reasons.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Hannibal - 01-17-2017
Feedback threads will only be closed to sort out the posts that needs to be cleaned and give a forum warning to those who post them.
However since the line haven't been crossed yet it will stay open, but be careful what you post don't turn it into a personal "thing"
RE: A/) - Feedback - A/)- The Inner Phalanx - 01-17-2017
The OP has been updated.
-Faction Lead
RE: A/) - Feedback - Vendetta - 01-17-2017
(01-16-2017, 10:06 PM)Auzari Wrote: Wait for your statement.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Divine - 01-17-2017
(01-17-2017, 12:40 PM)The Inner Phalanx Wrote: The OP has been updated.I don't know whether or not the following quote was always part of the OP or if you edited it in, as I've, to be blunt, read the OP now for the first time.
(08-13-2016, 12:47 AM)The Inner Phalanx Wrote: Questions that have already been answered will be ignored.But if you're going to state that you'll ignore all questions that have already been answered, then you might want to include an overview in your OP that'll summarize the questions you already answered in short and provide a link to the respective post where the answer can be found.
Because in all seriousness, nobody is going to read through your whole feedback to see if their question was already answered. And knowing this very well, it's rather unfashionable to expect people to do exactly that.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Vendetta - 01-17-2017
@
Answer sent on Skype.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Vendetta - 01-17-2017
@Implosion's question has (hopefully) been sorted out now after a lengthy discussion.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Corile - 01-24-2017
Regarding the fight in O3 a moment ago, what tipped you off to join a fight which was already heavily tilted in your favour despite the fact that you were apparently told by the BAF| to fuck off?
RE: A/) - Feedback - Vendetta - 01-24-2017
(01-24-2017, 12:30 AM)Corile Wrote: Regarding the fight in O3 a moment ago, what tipped you off to join a fight which was already heavily tilted in your favour despite the fact that you were apparently told by the BAF| to ***** off?
Please defer to post number 9.
RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 01-24-2017
[22:55:56] bafchat: hey you auxesians
[22:55:58] bafchat: wanna log that
[22:55:59] bafchat: HF GB again?
[22:56:05] bafchat: we need a GB vs their Imperator
cba to log a GB
so I logged a fighter to help shoot a gunboat, as did another person.
are you saying we should have brought a gunboat or something