Concerning the Oxygen thing, references were mostly used.
Right, thanks for pointing it out I guess, but would be cool if you had a reference source? Not all of us are physicists, and this is sci-fi, realism can only go so far in FL. Though, I agree that things have to make logical sense. When I was helping decide the atmosphere I never knew anything about mass within the air being a thing, what with pressure and gravity being a factor, etc.
The partial idea behind Elgin is that it was an erratic gem with alien-qualities anyway. Weird in it's own way. I suppose the atmosphere could be fit into that
thanks for the oversight anyway
Gases leak through any material. That's why balloons and football balls become "soft" over time, or car wheels. The lighter the gas is, the faster it leaks. Planet's atmospheres act as "balloons" in that sense for gases. Hydrogen is the lighest gas known to man (1 proton is the bare minimum for any atom really).
Escape velocity is the instantaneous velocity needed for a mass to escape the Earth's gravitational field. So basically the speed you need for something to get off the planet if you were to throw it manually, kind of. The lower the mass the lower the escape velocity necessary. That's why hydrogen is impossible to maintain in the open: it floats away instantly.
I am very unpleased about the methods Auxesia applies ingame for PvP as well as BEHAVIOR if you know what that is, speaking generaly.
Don't take it personally but seriously now, you should do some nice cleanup there. All I saw on this feedback thread was 100%-90% complains, as well as toxic ingame behavior.
Encourters with Auxesia are simply disgusting already, Role Play made simply in rush, PvP duels become ganks as soon as one of Aux members show up. There is a lost hope trying to Role Play even with you. I reached the point to avoid any interaction with you, because I know ehat it usually happens: disgusting RP followed by mass gank as usual.
You don't enjoy fighting them? I do, I had fun the other day in Delta, as wacked as the fight might've seemed. The group RP's themselves as combatants, so it's kind expected that they'd be quick to attack you depending on the situation. In any case, I've had long fun RP encounters and some pretty dicey fights with this faction, I find it fun, hope you guys are up for more!
Posts: 6,050
Threads: 464
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles: Art Developer
Considering there's people who try to paint us in a bad light no matter what, without knowing the background or any other knowledge concerning incidents - it's just laughable having people TRYING their best to twist a scenario into their favour in order to make us look bad. (eg killing people in a 4v4 and killing the survivor is ganking??).
Sharky, I don't think we've ever roleplayed with you - or even fought that much. I really do not recall encountering any of your characters personally, or anyone noting about it in MDs, etc.
And really, there isn't any ganking, or intended actions, but to me, to us; you're just spouting whatever you're listening to on Skype. It's full of rubbish intended to paint others in a bad light, and I'm highly aware you're in a skype chat who are particularly biased against us, as I've seen some lovely comments elsewhere. And I'm certain that we're not ganking because I am trying to promote positivity - though I cannot do it every single time depending on the situation, but everytime we try to remotely do something nice, we get shot down by ill-informed comments such as yours. We don't have aces in the faction either, pvp isn't everyone's cup of tea.
But please, if you have /nothing/ constructive to say from /personal experience/, please do not say anything at all. If there's someone or something that's lacking within their role, do say what happened with backing. I cannot be everywhere at several instance in one moment to help moderate a scenario.
(07-10-2017, 10:40 PM)Auzari Wrote: Considering there's people who try to paint us in a bad light no matter what, without knowing the background or any other knowledge concerning incidents - it's just laughable having people TRYING their best to twist a scenario into their favour in order to make us look bad. (eg killing people in a 4v4 and killing the survivor is ganking??).
Sharky, I don't think we've ever roleplayed with you - or even fought that much. I really do not recall encountering any of your characters personally, or anyone noting about it in MDs, etc.
And really, there isn't any ganking, or intended actions, but to me, to us; you're just spouting whatever you're listening to on Skype. It's full of rubbish intended to paint others in a bad light, and I'm highly aware you're in a skype chat who are particularly biased against us, as I've seen some lovely comments elsewhere. And I'm certain that we're not ganking because I am trying to promote positivity - though I cannot do it every single time depending on the situation, but everytime we try to remotely do something nice, we get shot down by ill-informed comments such as yours. We don't have aces in the faction either, pvp isn't everyone's cup of tea.
But please, if you have /nothing/ constructive to say from /personal experience/, please do not say anything at all. If there's someone or something that's lacking within their role, do say what happened with backing. I cannot be everywhere at several instance in one moment to help moderate a scenario.
Everyone cannot be pleased.
Seems you ignored my post so I'll reiterate for you, if you abuse game mechanics again like CDing someone who is cloaked so you can track them I will ensure you get slapped for it.
Play within the rules or be nailed by them. Your choice
Posts: 6,050
Threads: 464
Joined: Nov 2014
Staff roles: Art Developer
Looks like you didn't read the message either.
I don't care if you want to play sanctionlancer, nor care for your grudge. That person isn't in the faction, nor would any of our actual members would intend to exploit.
(07-10-2017, 10:40 PM)Auzari Wrote: Considering there's people who try to paint us in a bad light no matter what, without knowing the background or any other knowledge concerning incidents - it's just laughable having people TRYING their best to twist a scenario into their favour in order to make us look bad. (eg killing people in a 4v4 and killing the survivor is ganking??).
Sharky, I don't think we've ever roleplayed with you - or even fought that much. I really do not recall encountering any of your characters personally, or anyone noting about it in MDs, etc.
And really, there isn't any ganking, or intended actions, but to me, to us; you're just spouting whatever you're listening to on Skype. It's full of rubbish intended to paint others in a bad light, and I'm highly aware you're in a skype chat who are particularly biased against us, as I've seen some lovely comments elsewhere. And I'm certain that we're not ganking because I am trying to promote positivity - though I cannot do it every single time depending on the situation, but everytime we try to remotely do something nice, we get shot down by ill-informed comments such as yours. We don't have aces in the faction either, pvp isn't everyone's cup of tea.
But please, if you have /nothing/ constructive to say from /personal experience/, please do not say anything at all. If there's someone or something that's lacking within their role, do say what happened with backing. I cannot be everywhere at several instance in one moment to help moderate a scenario.
Everyone cannot be pleased.
Sadly, you are wrong here. Forgot that encourter in Cortez? I didn't, unfortunately. What was there, was clear shameless acting from Auxesia.
I don't follow someone else's view and tales about you, I follow my own experience I had with Auxesia. Faction has nice potential and great stuff leaving aside certain toxic members(not giving names). Lemme give you a small list of encourters I had:
-Cortez: complete fail interaction on both sides
-Kansas: Even worse interaction(from what I remember, I was threatened and considered "infected" or a "spy" followed by interogation because your members thought I was following them)
-Magellan: Fail as others (got considered a spy and as usually, got ganked by a gunboat and 2 snubs instantly although I was in a Light Fighter)
Ask your members about those scenarios, maybe I am wrong somewhere there, since they happened long time ago, but I do think I'm right.
Do I need to tell you other events that made your faction look bad?
Now...please note this VERY CAREFULLY: I understand 10-20 or even 30 members of the Community hating you and Auxesia. But really now, half or even more of the Community can't be wrong at all. What I see now is that there's a problem on your end, not mine or any other unpleased member.
Maybe now I can be naive/idiot/or "noob" as some of you tend to say, but I do see a small spark in Auxesia, don't take it down.
(07-10-2017, 10:31 PM)Barbara Jackson Wrote: You don't enjoy fighting them? I do, I had fun the other day in Delta, as wacked as the fight might've seemed. The group RP's themselves as combatants, so it's kind expected that they'd be quick to attack you depending on the situation. In any case, I've had long fun RP encounters and some pretty dicey fights with this faction, I find it fun, hope you guys are up for more!
ditto, was pressuring to fight against two archangel Bastets .