(04-15-2017, 10:18 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: Well, battleships don't need a CD, they have battleship missiles. Not really good to prevent anyone from fleeing, but from cloaking as well as to get rid of the shields. I would suggest to replace the CD of battlecruisers and cruisers with something similar. A slow, heavy CD, not a "I-throw-battlecruisers-against-everything"-CDs. In other words: Getting rid of cruiser/bc CDs and give them Cruiser missiles for that slot that work like CDs. That together with slow battleship thrusters may be useful.
pls no. BC and Cruiser without cd have no chance against Eking battleships, tho imagine BC eking on Cruiser you cant cd the bc so you will die
it will nerf BC-Cruisers to ground. also battleships dont need thruster
Read again what I wrote. Cruiser missiles with CD function, like battleship missiles. Just enough to prevent Weskering but not enough to lolwut anything. Right now, BCs can be thrown at everything and their mother with that.
(04-15-2017, 10:22 PM)sindroms Wrote: I wonder what would happen if you allowed capiships cruiser and above to expel their max DPS not forwards or backwards, but broadside only, necessitating the use of turret steering.
>every cap is now the LAC pre-modelchange
BRING BACK THE ATLANTIS
(04-15-2017, 10:49 PM)Chills Wrote: Lighter battleships have no problems dodging any mortars on even lower ranges down to 2k, and evade enough primary gun fire on the same range to survive a fight with any heavy
light battleships - medium battleships have no problems dodging cerberus at 1.4k too
(04-15-2017, 10:49 PM)Chills Wrote: Lighter battleships have no problems dodging any mortars on even lower ranges down to 2k, and evade enough primary gun fire on the same range to survive a fight with any heavy
light battleships - medium battleships have no problems dodging cerberus at 1.4k too
I didn't intend to include such capwhores like thundy
(04-15-2017, 10:22 PM)sindroms Wrote: I wonder what would happen if you allowed capiships cruiser and above to expel their max DPS not forwards or backwards, but broadside only, necessitating the use of turret steering.
some ship models are not suitable for broadside only pvp
(04-15-2017, 10:49 PM)Chills Wrote: Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/results?q=discov...p=CAI%253D. 8 Dunkirks and one Crecy, on the GRN side 2 Valors and 6 Battlecruiser. This video represents the past balance changes. This is the result of the huge nerfes for the valors aswell for the crecys. The restult of the event: Draw.
- RNS-Ressentiment, sometimes CNS-Nutella, Mount.Rongyu
That video
i led the charge against the valors
its understandable they died but the outcome at the end was going to become a gallic victory due to the unhittable BC's (Which require less skill, you can't argue that much) that stayed at max range slowly draining the kirks
(04-15-2017, 10:49 PM)Chills Wrote: Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/results?q=discov...p=CAI%253D. 8 Dunkirks and one Crecy, on the GRN side 2 Valors and 6 Battlecruiser. This video represents the past balance changes. This is the result of the huge nerfes for the valors aswell for the crecys. The restult of the event: Draw.
- RNS-Ressentiment, sometimes CNS-Nutella, Mount.Rongyu
That video
i led the charge against the valors
its understandable they died but the outcome at the end was going to become a gallic victory due to the unhittable BC's (Which require less skill, you can't argue that much) that stayed at max range slowly draining the kirks
This was not meant as offend towards the bretonian side, I would not have acted different. The focus should stay on the cap distribution between both sides and how it was before cerbs were nerfed.