Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ghostrunner"

From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(edit -> edits, minor addition)
(Added another note regarding version numbers.)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I will probably be replacing your commodity page edits with generated content soon, as they do not comply with our standards for commodity pages. Do also please stop adding your own "signatures"/advertisements to the pages you edit, as they are another thing that I will have to clean up. We do not allow for those, which is the reason for why you do not see anybody else leaving signatures like that on any other Wiki pages; they make the page look rather unprofessional, and do thus not belong here. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 02:29, 4 July 2015 (CEST)
 
I will probably be replacing your commodity page edits with generated content soon, as they do not comply with our standards for commodity pages. Do also please stop adding your own "signatures"/advertisements to the pages you edit, as they are another thing that I will have to clean up. We do not allow for those, which is the reason for why you do not see anybody else leaving signatures like that on any other Wiki pages; they make the page look rather unprofessional, and do thus not belong here. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 02:29, 4 July 2015 (CEST)
 
:Do please also not split the commodity table into separate tables, as this makes it impossible to sort and compare commodities any more. Leave a note on the talk page to suggest major changes like that before implementing them, please. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 02:32, 4 July 2015 (CEST)
 
:Do please also not split the commodity table into separate tables, as this makes it impossible to sort and compare commodities any more. Leave a note on the talk page to suggest major changes like that before implementing them, please. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 02:32, 4 July 2015 (CEST)
 +
::Sorry for this wall of complaints, I do not intend to come across as disapproving of your efforts, it's just that they are a bit misguided and the fact that I didn't notice most of them before now. The current Discovery version is also not v4.88.0.0, so "updating" commodity pages that were up-to-date for v4.88.0.2 (!) already to v4.88.0.0 is obviously not such a good idea. - [[User:Space|Space]] <sup>[[User talk:Space|(talk)]]</sup> 02:36, 4 July 2015 (CEST)

Revision as of 00:36, 4 July 2015

Your recent edits to the commodity pages

Hi; I'm unsure exactly what you're trying to do here. We already have standards for commodity pages - including a default template, Template:Commodity, which was already on all the updated pages (i.e. all of them). Please stop adding your own style to all the pages, it is like that for a reason, and removing the templates and doing it all by hand makes it incredibly difficult to maintain the page as you have to edit every single one of them if you want to make a small change. If you've got any major changes you want to implement, please contact me on my talk page or on Skype.

I will probably be replacing your commodity page edits with generated content soon, as they do not comply with our standards for commodity pages. Do also please stop adding your own "signatures"/advertisements to the pages you edit, as they are another thing that I will have to clean up. We do not allow for those, which is the reason for why you do not see anybody else leaving signatures like that on any other Wiki pages; they make the page look rather unprofessional, and do thus not belong here. - Space (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2015 (CEST)

Do please also not split the commodity table into separate tables, as this makes it impossible to sort and compare commodities any more. Leave a note on the talk page to suggest major changes like that before implementing them, please. - Space (talk) 02:32, 4 July 2015 (CEST)
Sorry for this wall of complaints, I do not intend to come across as disapproving of your efforts, it's just that they are a bit misguided and the fact that I didn't notice most of them before now. The current Discovery version is also not v4.88.0.0, so "updating" commodity pages that were up-to-date for v4.88.0.2 (!) already to v4.88.0.0 is obviously not such a good idea. - Space (talk) 02:36, 4 July 2015 (CEST)