08-08-2008, 06:41 PM
I was wondering if anyone else believes that first time offenders of minor rule violations should be warned before banned.
I am talking about rules such as OORP Violations, cursing, Wrong ID, Wrong Ship, reengaging or any other minor violation.
It seems an instant ban is a little bit iron fisted, couldn't we at least get a warning and fine first? I mean there are a lot of server rules its easy to forget or miss one of them and to act so harshly against violators without any warning seems a bit unfair.
I'm not saying no bans all together, cheaters, hackers and people who are aggressively attacking someone verbally and what not should be punished harshly. But first time offenders of OOC chat for example, these long bans just seem power hungry...
Who agrees? Who disagrees?
Keep in mind most of us are not little kids and a simple warning should suffice in letting us know we are in the wrong. Ban by all means if its a repeat violation i believe.
I am talking about rules such as OORP Violations, cursing, Wrong ID, Wrong Ship, reengaging or any other minor violation.
It seems an instant ban is a little bit iron fisted, couldn't we at least get a warning and fine first? I mean there are a lot of server rules its easy to forget or miss one of them and to act so harshly against violators without any warning seems a bit unfair.
I'm not saying no bans all together, cheaters, hackers and people who are aggressively attacking someone verbally and what not should be punished harshly. But first time offenders of OOC chat for example, these long bans just seem power hungry...
Who agrees? Who disagrees?
Keep in mind most of us are not little kids and a simple warning should suffice in letting us know we are in the wrong. Ban by all means if its a repeat violation i believe.