10-03-2016, 09:48 PM
The problem I've taken with this course of action is that it's an extremely harmful form of server administration.
The event thread was posted on August 24th, 2016. It was bumped several times throughout. When did the administration decide to take issue with the event and edit/post in the thread?
One hour and a half before the event was supposed to begin. You had essentially nine days to call off the event, get in touch with Yber, and get the event more in line with what you wanted, and you instead chose to quickly rush in at the last hour or so and slam down some hasty edits saying "No, you can't participate in this event if you're outside your ZOI!"
And sure, you could make the argument that it's "common sense" that the event shouldn't have gone through since it "violates the rules", except for the fact that it's been run successfully for the last two years at the same time, and last year's event was essentially identical. Considering the staff was almost literally identical in Sep. '15 as it was in Sep '16 (with the exception of Dimon and Hannibal)...it's curious, I suppose, how the staff opinion of an event can vary so wildly with so little change.
Although, honestly, my problem isn't so much that the staff decided to shut down the XTF event, but rather how it was handled. If you wanted to keep the event from happening, you honestly could've done it far before it became such an inconvenience to everyone involved, and ruining an event for many people that had been, from a year ago up until an hour and a half before it happened, completely legal and allowed by the rules. If you somehow didn't realize the event was happening AND somehow changed your minds completely on the idea that the event should take place, then I don't see the harm in letting the event play out, since it was so close to occurring, and then dropping a post that the event will need to be changed or edited to happen again in the future. This would reflect an admin team that doesn't want to ruin the fun of anyone involved - not just those who are against the event, but those who are FOR the event, as well. This would show an admin team exercising restraint. Unfortunately, that hasn't happened, and rather than apologizing and noting that the handling of this was in error, you've decided that instead it is the fault of those involved - those who were essentially blindsided with minimal communication from the staff prior to the event - for not...reporting Hannibal's actions to the admin team? Is that not what this thread is for?
And, Jansen, to tack on to Yber's response, the problem with Hannibal's post lies in the fact that it, at best, completely ignores the problems with this decision at best, and at worst, essentially patronizes Yber and those who tried to organize this event for not suddenly listening to the Word of God who hastily scribbled across the event that had been up for over a week because suddenly, out of nowhere, this event was VERBOTEN and anyone who attended who was outside of their ZOI was going to face SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES. Heaven forbid some people want to get together and shoot each other once a year for an hour and a half in a system that isn't Connecticut to celebrate a really old Freelancer group that's managed to still exist.
You can argue that this event was a "threat to the structure of the server environment" or whatever, but I don't see anyone except yourselves cheering that "the sanctity of the server was upheld!" and "the RP nature of the community was kept alive!" by performing this action, and especially in performing it the way you did.
Rant over, I suppose. Back to being another "biased member of the community".
ed: to correct my statement slightly, the event this year was a bit broader (I was under the impression that it only took place across a couple of systems in the Taus), but at the same time there was apparently a coordination chat between and the admin team, so really my point(s) still stand(s).
The event thread was posted on August 24th, 2016. It was bumped several times throughout. When did the administration decide to take issue with the event and edit/post in the thread?
One hour and a half before the event was supposed to begin. You had essentially nine days to call off the event, get in touch with Yber, and get the event more in line with what you wanted, and you instead chose to quickly rush in at the last hour or so and slam down some hasty edits saying "No, you can't participate in this event if you're outside your ZOI!"
And sure, you could make the argument that it's "common sense" that the event shouldn't have gone through since it "violates the rules", except for the fact that it's been run successfully for the last two years at the same time, and last year's event was essentially identical. Considering the staff was almost literally identical in Sep. '15 as it was in Sep '16 (with the exception of Dimon and Hannibal)...it's curious, I suppose, how the staff opinion of an event can vary so wildly with so little change.
Although, honestly, my problem isn't so much that the staff decided to shut down the XTF event, but rather how it was handled. If you wanted to keep the event from happening, you honestly could've done it far before it became such an inconvenience to everyone involved, and ruining an event for many people that had been, from a year ago up until an hour and a half before it happened, completely legal and allowed by the rules. If you somehow didn't realize the event was happening AND somehow changed your minds completely on the idea that the event should take place, then I don't see the harm in letting the event play out, since it was so close to occurring, and then dropping a post that the event will need to be changed or edited to happen again in the future. This would reflect an admin team that doesn't want to ruin the fun of anyone involved - not just those who are against the event, but those who are FOR the event, as well. This would show an admin team exercising restraint. Unfortunately, that hasn't happened, and rather than apologizing and noting that the handling of this was in error, you've decided that instead it is the fault of those involved - those who were essentially blindsided with minimal communication from the staff prior to the event - for not...reporting Hannibal's actions to the admin team? Is that not what this thread is for?
And, Jansen, to tack on to Yber's response, the problem with Hannibal's post lies in the fact that it, at best, completely ignores the problems with this decision at best, and at worst, essentially patronizes Yber and those who tried to organize this event for not suddenly listening to the Word of God who hastily scribbled across the event that had been up for over a week because suddenly, out of nowhere, this event was VERBOTEN and anyone who attended who was outside of their ZOI was going to face SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES. Heaven forbid some people want to get together and shoot each other once a year for an hour and a half in a system that isn't Connecticut to celebrate a really old Freelancer group that's managed to still exist.
The Rules Wrote:The intent behind these rules are for everyone to be excellent to one another, and to use common sense. Consider the people around you. Keep fair play in mind. It's a game and nothing is gained, or lost, save the experience. Credits can be re-earned. Ammunition replenished. If you become infuriated step away. If you make a mistake apologize. If you wish to find a loophole in the rules, good luck.
Fair play, a level head and consideration for others are paramount. The rules are not a sword or shield to be used for or against someone, but to ensure that the server environment has structure and allows everyone to have fun.
You can argue that this event was a "threat to the structure of the server environment" or whatever, but I don't see anyone except yourselves cheering that "the sanctity of the server was upheld!" and "the RP nature of the community was kept alive!" by performing this action, and especially in performing it the way you did.
Rant over, I suppose. Back to being another "biased member of the community".
ed: to correct my statement slightly, the event this year was a bit broader (I was under the impression that it only took place across a couple of systems in the Taus), but at the same time there was apparently a coordination chat between