Discovery Gaming Community

Full Version: Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(02-12-2016, 06:37 PM)Landers Wrote: [ -> ]Aaaand that's actually happened when nobody but the two of us were in 14k range, so I refuse that to be used for anything.

For your information, you can be also punished on basis of Skype logs.

Just a fair warning.
(02-12-2016, 06:56 PM)Toris Wrote: [ -> ]For your information, you can be also punished on basis of Skype logs.

Just a fair warning.

I would very much love to shave every single bit of your fur for saying something stupid like this. This is not the case, you don't get banned for Skype stuff.

If you reference the Divine drama with this, the ban was questionable for being based on skype content, that is true, but it's at the same time not questionable when the entire issue was down to an individual being out of control and impossible to reason with. All in all, he got banned for being a terrible person at the time and being harmful to the community, but not for trashing on Skype. A lot of people would be banned if that was the case.
Running around screaming Allahu akbar is stupid. There are no two ways about it.
(02-12-2016, 07:17 PM)Alley Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:For your information, you can be also punished on basis of Skype logs.

Just a fair warning.
(...) you don't get banned for Skype stuff.

Never mentioned anything about banning people. I just pointed out that cussing on people on Skype might be punished one way or another. ^^
Except it won't.

It's like getting banned from YouTube because you farted at someone else on Facebook.

(02-12-2016, 07:30 PM)Nyx Wrote: [ -> ]Except it won't.

That's a novum. I has been always told that bashing other players via Skype is still sanctionable.
(02-12-2016, 05:38 PM)Sturmwind Wrote: [ -> ]No. It is a fundamental part of Islam and has nothing to do with terrorism. Besides, neither of us used the phrase since the first time were told not to, so I dont see your point.

This is in fact the issue.
We have rules here that disallow ANY present or effective religious or political reference simple as it. Excluded is stuff that doesn't influence todays society anymore. Like Order with an ancient Egypt reference or nomad with its Sumerian convention. Don't know why this wasn't already posted here. Keep in mind this is an english-language community therefore the word god just means the generic term "god" and doesn't have any relation to "Christians". The word Allah means god as well, but has majorly the context to the religion in an international community.
(02-12-2016, 07:54 PM)Genexus Wrote: [ -> ]We have rules here that disallow ANY present or effective religious or political reference simple as it.

Gaians are Greenpeace, with the latter classified as terrorist organization. How is it not a political reference in the first place?

Not to mention current Rheinland looks like Weimar Republic and Republic of Kusari pretty ressembles Chinese Repubic from 1911 (which was a regime).
Let that sink in.

[Image: giphy.gif]
(02-12-2016, 07:58 PM)Toris Wrote: [ -> ]
(02-12-2016, 07:54 PM)Genexus Wrote: [ -> ]We have rules here that disallow ANY present or effective religious or political reference simple as it.

Gaians are Greenpeace, with the latter classified as terrorist organization. How is it not a political reference in the first place?

Not to mention current Rheinland looks like Weimar Republic and Republic of Kusari pretty ressembles Chinese Repubic from 1911 (which was a regime).
Let that sink in.

Rheinland and Kusari are parts of Vanilla, changing this wouldn't make that much sense. Seriously, don't know how these references are mentioned though, because they don't affect todays society.
There a plenty of quite references in movies, books and else about fundamental nature fans. Serving and fighting for the nature aren't invented by Greenpeace. Aside from this, are you and this news side seriously saying Greenpeace has a political influence?