(12-24-2015, 01:02 PM)Karst Wrote: [ -> ]
And Huggie's attitude to feedback is the worst I have ever seen. I wonder how long it will take him to run this faction into the ground entirely.
few weeks or months, not going to be long from now anyways.
I for one, have never silent engaged or witnessed someone silent engage a Nom player ever. Anywhere. At all. This whole "do unto others" attitude is whats casting the K'Hara in such a bad light. The abuse of the cloaks to obtain insta-blues is really crappy behavior from you guys. Like really? You're better than that. Act with a modicum of decency and not so immature in response to feedback. Your actions arent terrorizing, they're dull, boring and annoying. Sitting back and watching this thread manifest into what it is, and huggie, your responses? Wow, how the mighty have fallen.
I used to like the Noms, like a hundred years ago near the end times of the keepers. I tried to join once, but had to leave Disco due to RL purposes. As they sit now, I wouldnt join, or reccommend K'Hara as a faction to anyone new. Its just a big bunch of purple shaitters.
Set a standard, before you slip any further.
(12-24-2015, 02:04 PM)Chuba Wrote: [ -> ] (12-24-2015, 01:02 PM)Karst Wrote: [ -> ]
And Huggie's attitude to feedback is the worst I have ever seen. I wonder how long it will take him to run this faction into the ground entirely.
few weeks or months, not going to be long from now anyways.
Whot.
Must've missed something. I was sure it already was buldozered into the ground some time ago.
Maybe that's just me.
Nah, I do not camp lanes.
In your case, I just really really really wanted to shoot you, so I got tired of waiting for you and jumped into Manchester after you. The reason you jumped out is because you saw me start docking with the lane, but then pause when I saw you pop up on scanner.
waiiiiiiiiiiiit a minute
so thats you in that nomad?
the one who watched, the list and who was in dublin, and when i jumped into NL, you uncloaked, and i went boom?
you dont camp lanes?
By the way, that's a confession on both 1.2 and 1.7 violations.
(12-24-2015, 05:33 PM)Doria Wrote: [ -> ]By the way, that's a confession on both 1.2 and 1.7 violations.
Except not really because we've already been over this. Well, maybe 1.2 would stick, actually, but that's enforced entirely arbitrarily as a catch all for detrimental activities that aren't technically against the rules.
@an'shur - That's a ridiculously disingenuous statement when this behaviour is actively endorsed by Huggie, and the ability to silently engage has now been limited to only the most active members. That means if the faction actually bothers to enforce its own internal rules, the most problematic elements of the faction are the members that are also most representative of it in hours and values.