11-23-2009, 01:20 PM
I have used the search engine, but as it seems no-one pointed out this question yet. Well were was some attempts to do it in not weapon balance threads but they cooled down quite fast. Anyhow perhaps its time to mention this agian, since update 3 is not too far.
First of all, I used them myself. Had lots of fight's agianst them too. As well, they were my main weapons in non modded freelancer servers.
Anyhow I start thinking that those guns are.. well almost the best avalible in the game, but, let's not jump to conclusions yet. I got some argumants on my sleave.
First I tried to talk about them with Jure on the r.i.p opg chat. Well seems he agreed that the guns are quite too powerfull. And concider to give them 600m/s (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here, Jure) since they have bunch of advantages. First lets take a look to the stats, and try to compare with other faction guns. Lets keep in mind that Graviton shield is the most common. I know that some of you are using diffrent ones, but untill the main shield killers are pulses, gravitons will be the most universal choice and will be the most used.
Salamanka mk II (Corsairs):
2120 dmg per second.
462 energy drain per second
600 m range
600 m/s speed.
Refire 4. Neutron, so does half hull damage to the most common shields. No bonuses or reduction.
Skyblast B (GMG)
1882,6 dmg per second.
524,8 evergy drain per second
600m range
750m/s speed
Refire 8.33. Photon. Does 1/5 reducted shield dmg to the most common shields. Keep in mind that same faction fights corsairs, which uses strong pulses, so switching to mocular wouldnt help a lot in universal situation.
Now to compare to other guns
For example:
Nutterturn Zwei (hessians):
1911 dmg per second.
488 energy drain per second
600 range
750 m/s speed.
Refire 5,88. Agian laser. Doest 1/5 reduced dmg to most common shields.
Lets take up some of other guns. Like Hogosha who sometimes meets outcasts in kusari
Drake type D (hogosha):
2080 dmg per second
500 energy drain
600 m range
600 m/s speed
refire 4. Does 1/5 bonus damage to the most common shields.
Now lets pick up the krakens:
2224 dmg per second.
504 energy per second drained.
700m range
700m/s speed (almost 750 m/s but just with +100 range)
Refire 4 with 1/5 bonus dmg on most common shields.
I saw Mjolnir mentioned huge energy drain. Bah GMG weapons eats even more energy. Actually its quite moderate, but just with huge dps output at 700 m/s speed, high refire and bonus shield dmg. In overall the yare even better than most codies in damage. While having huge speed... and refire they are better than almost all of the codies.
In earlier threads I posted this:
"Nerf them. Simple, They are simply to powerfull comapred to other faction guns.
Im not wininghere or nothing, just take a look at them yourselves:
2224 dps (quite a lot, almost like 3 refire codies, aint it?)
20 percent more shield dmg agianst most popular shield type (1334 shield dmg dps, quite a lot, bigger then some of the 3 refire codies)
Refire 4... as for such damage its a lot..
And looky look 700 m/s and 700 range... for only moderate energy drain. IF you think im wrong here, take a look at Xeno guns, looks fair to you?..
And even more, they are class 9, that means outcasts can put 7 of those on their sabres. You can say like 'it drains energy so fast" .. as well as it delivers sagificant amount of damage in very short time, and it is an advantage, besides no-one is holding pilot to turn off 3 krakens from 7 for a dogfight. Combined it with inferno, sabres even becomes suprame cap killers... 3 sabres can kill 2 liberty LABC, and its not hypothetical.
well your toughts?"
The thing is that those guns are openly sold to their allies. Secondly you can mount 7 of those on a sabre. Having a huge advantage of lots of damage in short period of time, and at quite good accuracy (4 refire 700 m/s)
So, your toughts, perhaps you know something I overlooked or didn't mentioned here. (oh and please no "Do not touch our guns" responses, i understand they are good and you want to keep them, but in some terms they are just too good)
P.S weedalot, untill you didnt started your childish nuisense to bash me, write pm, not in this thread, thanks for understanding.
First of all, I used them myself. Had lots of fight's agianst them too. As well, they were my main weapons in non modded freelancer servers.
Anyhow I start thinking that those guns are.. well almost the best avalible in the game, but, let's not jump to conclusions yet. I got some argumants on my sleave.
First I tried to talk about them with Jure on the r.i.p opg chat. Well seems he agreed that the guns are quite too powerfull. And concider to give them 600m/s (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here, Jure) since they have bunch of advantages. First lets take a look to the stats, and try to compare with other faction guns. Lets keep in mind that Graviton shield is the most common. I know that some of you are using diffrent ones, but untill the main shield killers are pulses, gravitons will be the most universal choice and will be the most used.
Salamanka mk II (Corsairs):
2120 dmg per second.
462 energy drain per second
600 m range
600 m/s speed.
Refire 4. Neutron, so does half hull damage to the most common shields. No bonuses or reduction.
Skyblast B (GMG)
1882,6 dmg per second.
524,8 evergy drain per second
600m range
750m/s speed
Refire 8.33. Photon. Does 1/5 reducted shield dmg to the most common shields. Keep in mind that same faction fights corsairs, which uses strong pulses, so switching to mocular wouldnt help a lot in universal situation.
Now to compare to other guns
For example:
Nutterturn Zwei (hessians):
1911 dmg per second.
488 energy drain per second
600 range
750 m/s speed.
Refire 5,88. Agian laser. Doest 1/5 reduced dmg to most common shields.
Lets take up some of other guns. Like Hogosha who sometimes meets outcasts in kusari
Drake type D (hogosha):
2080 dmg per second
500 energy drain
600 m range
600 m/s speed
refire 4. Does 1/5 bonus damage to the most common shields.
Now lets pick up the krakens:
2224 dmg per second.
504 energy per second drained.
700m range
700m/s speed (almost 750 m/s but just with +100 range)
Refire 4 with 1/5 bonus dmg on most common shields.
I saw Mjolnir mentioned huge energy drain. Bah GMG weapons eats even more energy. Actually its quite moderate, but just with huge dps output at 700 m/s speed, high refire and bonus shield dmg. In overall the yare even better than most codies in damage. While having huge speed... and refire they are better than almost all of the codies.
In earlier threads I posted this:
"Nerf them. Simple, They are simply to powerfull comapred to other faction guns.
Im not wininghere or nothing, just take a look at them yourselves:
2224 dps (quite a lot, almost like 3 refire codies, aint it?)
20 percent more shield dmg agianst most popular shield type (1334 shield dmg dps, quite a lot, bigger then some of the 3 refire codies)
Refire 4... as for such damage its a lot..
And looky look 700 m/s and 700 range... for only moderate energy drain. IF you think im wrong here, take a look at Xeno guns, looks fair to you?..
And even more, they are class 9, that means outcasts can put 7 of those on their sabres. You can say like 'it drains energy so fast" .. as well as it delivers sagificant amount of damage in very short time, and it is an advantage, besides no-one is holding pilot to turn off 3 krakens from 7 for a dogfight. Combined it with inferno, sabres even becomes suprame cap killers... 3 sabres can kill 2 liberty LABC, and its not hypothetical.
well your toughts?"
The thing is that those guns are openly sold to their allies. Secondly you can mount 7 of those on a sabre. Having a huge advantage of lots of damage in short period of time, and at quite good accuracy (4 refire 700 m/s)
So, your toughts, perhaps you know something I overlooked or didn't mentioned here. (oh and please no "Do not touch our guns" responses, i understand they are good and you want to keep them, but in some terms they are just too good)
P.S weedalot, untill you didnt started your childish nuisense to bash me, write pm, not in this thread, thanks for understanding.