07-19-2010, 07:30 AM
I want you guys to have a think about something called the "Nanite Revolution"
NANITE REVOLUTION
Nanotechnology went from being just a pipe dream to a reality. These tiny little robots were supposed to bring about a golden age of humanity.
Imagine freedom from disease and injury, repair of DNA and cells ravaged by age, enhancing human attributes. Nothing short of immortality was promised by advocates of the Nanite Revolution.
So what happened? How is it that humans in 818 A.S arent much different to what they are now in 2010 A.D?
Well, every revolution has a counter-revolution, and every new dawn casts a shadow.
Just as the advent of computers saw the rise of computer viruses, just as the use of antibiotics saw the evolution of resistant microbes - so the nanite revolution saw the emergence of potentially dangerous nanobots.
From errant machines to maliciously created tools of destruction - the centuries since the introduction of nanotech have seen an arms race between beneficial and harmful nanobots among the human population.
What is the net result of this? ZERO! All the potentially good effects of nanobots is effectively cancelled by the harmful ones. Instead of people dying of cancer they might well die of a hostile nanite infestation. Resources spent by lawful governments on perfecting nanotech are spent instead on countering new non-threats emerging from malicious individuals and organisations.
Just a little something to think about...
NANITE REVOLUTION
Nanotechnology went from being just a pipe dream to a reality. These tiny little robots were supposed to bring about a golden age of humanity.
Imagine freedom from disease and injury, repair of DNA and cells ravaged by age, enhancing human attributes. Nothing short of immortality was promised by advocates of the Nanite Revolution.
So what happened? How is it that humans in 818 A.S arent much different to what they are now in 2010 A.D?
Well, every revolution has a counter-revolution, and every new dawn casts a shadow.
Just as the advent of computers saw the rise of computer viruses, just as the use of antibiotics saw the evolution of resistant microbes - so the nanite revolution saw the emergence of potentially dangerous nanobots.
From errant machines to maliciously created tools of destruction - the centuries since the introduction of nanotech have seen an arms race between beneficial and harmful nanobots among the human population.
What is the net result of this? ZERO! All the potentially good effects of nanobots is effectively cancelled by the harmful ones. Instead of people dying of cancer they might well die of a hostile nanite infestation. Resources spent by lawful governments on perfecting nanotech are spent instead on countering new non-threats emerging from malicious individuals and organisations.
Just a little something to think about...