+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Knock it off, Dumbliners (/showthread.php?tid=55453)
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Dab - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:Yes, it's a shame you don't live up to them.Please quote which infocards we don't live up to. (sun)
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Ghost Reaver - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:Please quote which infocards we don't live up to. (sun)
The ones related to you winning any kind of fight whatsoever. (sun)
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Dab - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:The ones related to you winning any kind of fight whatsoever. (sun)So I was right in assuming you were trolling without anything real to contribute.
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Cond0r - 02-24-2011
Hey, when they run to a stationary Battleship, call you a coward and make you move away for more than 10k .... thats a win baby.:cool:
' Wrote:The BAF is also at a stalemate in Dublin, where they fight inferior numbers with inferior equipment.Agreed.
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Ghost Reaver - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:So I was right in assuming you were trolling without anything real to contribute.
Yes I know you want to add to your little portfolio that meany Ghosty is making fun of a Faction you are in (which of course must lead to punishment) but if you take a second to reflect upon the matter you will see that you quoted him saying that infocards state against his claims of BAF losing the war/fights.
At which I say you don't live up to the infocards. What, did I pick on a soft spot? Last time I checked running to a indestructible object that can damage the opponent and then declare victory over a written rule on the forums doesn't really fall in line with some alleged infocard that talks about battles and war. You know, a war usually includes two or more parties actually fighting each other.
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Jack_Henderson - 02-24-2011
Nah, come on, guys.
This is not a BAF-bashing thread. Leave the man alone.
This is also not an IMG bashing thread. Leave them alone.
This is simply a thread in which some different perspective about a complex roleplay situation evolved and that needs to be dealt with. Since it is an OORP problem, it has to be done oorply.
Funny thing is somehow, that this is drifting into a direction of "We can/could do bad things to you because ... [reasons XYZ] in case [ABC]." This leads nowhere.
I can see things cleared up by exactly explaining what was perceived and then comparing perceptions. On the basis of that one can judge whether the reactions were okay or exagerated and - and this is the only really relevant part - try to do better now.
Good night. =)
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Dab - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:Yes I know you want to add to your little portfolio that meany Ghosty is making fun of a Faction you are in (which of course must lead to punishment) but if you take a second to reflect upon the matter you will see that you quoted him saying that infocards state against his claims of BAF losing the war/fights.No, not at all really. I don't give much worth to people saying things I know are just troll posts. Yes, most of the BAF you fight die, you do have a squad of highly experienced pvp'ers using Chimaeras (not that you shouldn't) that happen to be highly superior to the Templar in terms of balance (as pretty much all Kusari ships are when compared to any Bret/Lib ship). But you're not the only ones we fight, and as the dev team has said many times and given countless reasons for, the outcomes of player fights have no bearing on development. Nor can we control it. We can, however, control our RP. And our RP is in line with our lore. As such, we don't care about your opinion on the matter.
At which I say you don't live up to the infocards. What, did I pick on a soft spot?
"We kill BAF, give us Leeds now" has been said in different variations of faction/system by lots of people. You're not going to get a different result.
Again, produce any infocard to which our roleplay doesn't live up to.
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Ghost Reaver - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:No, not at all really. I don't give much worth to people saying things I know are just troll posts. Yes, most of the BAF you fight die, you do have a squad of highly experienced pvp'ers using Chimaeras (not that you shouldn't) that happen to be highly superior to the Templar in terms of balance (as pretty much all Kusari ships are when compared to any Bret/Lib ship). But you're not the only ones we fight, and as the dev team has said many times and given countless reasons for, the outcomes of player fights have no bearing on development. Nor can we control it. We can, however, control our RP. And our RP is in line with our lore. As such, we don't care about your opinion on the matter.
"We kill BAF, give us Leeds now" has been said in different variations of faction/system by lots of people. You're not going to get a different result.
Again, produce any infocard to which our roleplay doesn't live up to.
I'm not gonna sit and go through a bunch of text I couldn't care less about. Fact of the matter is, he claims the BAF are losing the war, you say the infocards says otherwise and I finish it up with saying the mentioned faction does not live up to this claim in game. Is there any part of this text which you do not comprehend, feel free to contact me.
I don't care that you do not care about my opinion, I still wish to state it. If you have a problem, simply claim I'm trolling you and plot to establish a punishment. Oh wait.
And I find it funny how you go from "It's storyline" to "You are trolling" to general whine about technology difference which is why you lose fights (no it because you suck at fighting and you are incompetent to each others) to finally, "I don't care about your opinion". You are such a good hypocrite.
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Dab - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:I'm not gonna sit and go through a bunch of text I couldn't care less about. Fact of the matter is, he claims the BAF are losing the war, you say the infocards says otherwise and I finish it up with saying the mentioned faction does not live up to this claim in game. Is there any part of this text which you do not comprehend, feel free to contact me.I comprehend it completely. My above points stand.
I don't care that you do not care about my opinion, I still wish to state it. If you have a problem, simply claim I'm trolling you and plot to establish a punishment. Oh wait.
And I find it funny how you go from "It's storyline" to "You are trolling" to general whine about technology difference which is why you lose fights to finally, "I don't care about your opinion". You are such a good hypocrite.
' Wrote:text I couldn't care less about.
And this shows why I don't value your opinion. You don't care about the roleplay or the lore, why should I care what your opinion of us is?
Knock it off, Dumbliners - Ghost Reaver - 02-24-2011
' Wrote:I comprehend it completely. My above points stand.
' Wrote:And this shows why I don't value your opinion. You don't care about the roleplay or the lore, why should I care what your opinion of us is?
Let me rephrase:
You do not live up to the infocards of which you speak of. That is the only thing I have said.
You are trying to defend yourself that you do. But you don't. So, you can either stop arguing that you do, or I can continue and explain why you don't. Or you can just say that you don't care about in-game fights and leave it alone.