![]() |
Liberty Navy [LN] Feedback Thread - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60) +---- Forum: Liberty (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=71) +----- Forum: [LN] (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=715) +----- Thread: Liberty Navy [LN] Feedback Thread (/showthread.php?tid=11128) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
|
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Teerin - 06-26-2015 Kudos back! While I wasn't there for the initial roleplay, it was still fun to come in with Mehndi being himself and Sius going a tad bit into the deep end. As for the numbers, yeah let's do better next time. We were all a bit uncertain when to shoot because of what was happening to Remus, and my own character getting a bit irritated due to the inaction of the rest. Make Heathen due some sort of MD report, by the way, since we let him run off. Should be fun to read! RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Stoner_Steve - 07-23-2015 This is a total joke There is not a single military service on this entire planet that would allow an Admiral to speak their mind publicly and still remain at their post. If the Navy wanted to maintain credibility they should have demoted the admiral, there is nothing preventing the player behind the character from creating a new Admiral to reflect their position within the Liberty Navy. Punishment would be handed out and far less people would be upset; however the path the Liberty Navy (and by extension the Liberty Government) has taken tells me that the Liberty Government is nothing more than a joke that exists to only benefit those "in the know" RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Sarawr!? - 07-23-2015 This is not a real military, this is not based on a real military, this is a fictional military organization within a rather loose sci-fi setting. Think of Mass Effect if you want, plenty of things happened in there in regard to military discipline and the suchlike that would certainly not happen in real life. Was it still enjoyable? Hell yes it was. This is not real life. This is the only comment I'm going to make here. RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Wildkins - 07-23-2015 (07-23-2015, 01:40 AM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: This is a total joke Woah, slow down there, partner. DoD Directives specifically state that members of the military may possess and read any material they want, including anti-war material. They may distribute any such material even if it is critical of government policies of officials. Distribution may be limited - but not ceased - if the material presents "a clear and present danger to the loyalty, discipline, or morale of military personnel." That's 1325.6, for those interested. 1325.6 also states that military members' "right of expression" is preserved, including peaceful demonstrations against the government or the war, as long as it is done away from a military installation, while off duty, and out of uniform. The only issue I've found that conflicts with what Baker has done here is covered under the UCMJ, which states that it is illegal to communicate "with the enemy", although the examples they give specifically refer to letters and other types of methods of communication. I'm willing to give a pass on this one, as this is less a communication with the enemy and more a propaganda-filled message/speech. Think the attempts at anti-propaganda the US has been creating recently. Is it perhaps out of character for an Admiral? Probably, yes. But Baker has never been a traditional Admiral. I'm still thinking on whether or not she'll be punished inRP for her..."zealous" action, but I'm honestly leaning towards a no. I still think this situation is horribly overblown and not as serious as everyone is taking it, but maybe I'm wrong. RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Stoner_Steve - 07-23-2015 (07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: 1325.6 also states that military members' "right of expression" is preserved, including peaceful demonstrations against the government or the war, as long as it is done away from a military installation, while off duty, and out of uniform. So by your example using a government e-mail address to publicly communicate with an enemy group doesn't count (assuming the T-bars which have Liberty Navy stamped all over them counts as government representation) (07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: The only issue I've found that conflicts with what Baker has done here is covered under the UCMJ, which states that it is illegal to communicate "with the enemy", although the examples they give specifically refer to letters and other types of methods of communication. I'm willing to give a pass on this one, as this is less a communication with the enemy and more a propaganda-filled message/speech. Think the attempts at anti-propaganda the US has been creating recently. Propaganda doesn't start with legitimatizing the enemies operations and end with throwing other supporting organizations under the bus. (07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: Is it perhaps out of character for an Admiral? Probably, yes. But Baker has never been a traditional Admiral. I'm still thinking on whether or not she'll be punished inRP for her..."zealous" action, but I'm honestly leaning towards a no. I still think this situation is horribly overblown and not as serious as everyone is taking it, but maybe I'm wrong. An Admiral de-legitimatized the Liberty Government and legitimatized the Commonwealth all within one transmission. You can claim that its propaganda but it doesn't read as such to me. RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Wildkins - 07-23-2015 (07-23-2015, 02:19 AM)Captain_Nemo Wrote:(07-23-2015, 02:00 AM)John Wildkins Wrote: 1325.6 also states that military members' "right of expression" is preserved, including peaceful demonstrations against the government or the war, as long as it is done away from a military installation, while off duty, and out of uniform. Then that's your opinion, man. I can't help you with that. RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Tokoloshe - 07-23-2015 (07-23-2015, 01:53 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: This is not a real military, this is not based on a real military, this is a fictional military organization within a rather loose sci-fi setting. Think of Mass Effect if you want, plenty of things happened in there in regard to military discipline and the suchlike that would certainly not happen in real life. Was it still enjoyable? Hell yes it was. No really? This isn't real? Damn, we thought it was! I think this is people telling you that they are not interested in seeing any more of your particular brand of fiction. RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Sarawr!? - 07-23-2015 (07-23-2015, 02:19 AM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: An Admiral de-legitimatized the Liberty Government and legitimatized the Commonwealth all within one transmission. You can claim that its propaganda but it doesn't read as such to me. Rachel Baker Wrote:[indent] RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Sarawr!? - 07-23-2015 (07-23-2015, 02:29 AM)Tokoloshe Wrote:(07-23-2015, 01:53 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: This is not a real military, this is not based on a real military, this is a fictional military organization within a rather loose sci-fi setting. Think of Mass Effect if you want, plenty of things happened in there in regard to military discipline and the suchlike that would certainly not happen in real life. Was it still enjoyable? Hell yes it was. Let me lay it out pretty simply for you then -- I do not care. If you do not enjoy my writing, or the personalities of my characters, and the things I'm doing have nothing to do with you, DO NOT INVOLVE YOURSELF. RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Tokoloshe - 07-23-2015 (07-23-2015, 02:33 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: Let me lay it out pretty simply for you then -- I do not care. If you do not enjoy my writing, or the personalities of my characters, and the things I'm doing have nothing to do with you, DO NOT INVOLVE YOURSELF. Then allow me to not care either, by not making people like you the people who officially define faction diplomacy. Sheesh I wish I couldn't care about anything you posted. God knows I do. |