Discovery Gaming Community
Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? (/showthread.php?tid=169104)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - R.P.Curator - 03-27-2019

Debate on how and why the community is upset about the Aland takeover + / - opinions / interpretations and various related matters.
Also, seems to be a lot of remembering about ages gone by, instead of focusing how to improve; and some guys just complaining cause they can do so.
Savvy?


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - Ash - 03-28-2019

(03-27-2019, 12:56 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: It cannot be considered a healthy way of doing things for the community to be seen as no more than puppets on strings, or robots with a directive to do the developer's bidding. This is what has, and is, contributing to people losing motivation and leaving the game. We have a falling player count.

You can argue that there was considerably less input from players in previous years, but are you seriously trying to argue that was a positive thing? Consider the Rheinland-Liberty war: it was forcefully ended by the developer's and we lost a seriously good activity generator. The Gallic war had a narrative that seemed largely artificial, and as I've said previously, it's my belief that rhe forced story of the Gallic war is exactly why its taken so long to resolve. Oh and let's not forget the Kusari Civil War, jesus christ.

Also consider that the moments when Disco activity and roleplay was at it's highest was when organic player roleplay took center stage in the community. That's what we need more of, not less, and the recent Omega stuff is the exact opposite of organic and dynamic story progression.

A bit of a delayed response i apologise.

Referring to player input as ‘organic’ doesn’t necessarily make it a good thing. There are systems in place by which players can petition to have their suggestions implemented, but that does not necessarily mean that they will be. A problem with this i see is the amount of build up required to qualify for consideration. Like Aland, Rheinland, Kusari and the rest of it, players believed if they put in the work, the time, they’d ‘earn’ their input. But that’s never been the deal. So naturally players are getting really salty when their ideas are rebuked in the final stages after jumping through so many hoops. This needs to change so that people waste less of their time chasing pipe dreams and that way we’ll get less frustration and people leaving.

But i stand by what i said with regard to the position of players. People need to take a step back and let the leadership lead, it’s their job, as well as stop mistaking opportunity for entitlement.


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - pulha - 03-29-2019

Here you have the best example of biased stuff

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=11947&pid=2071177#pid2071177

Everyone else must do the rp after knowing about things on patch notes.


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - Kaze - 03-29-2019

(03-29-2019, 05:43 PM)pulha Wrote: Here you have the best example of biased stuff

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=11947&pid=2071177#pid2071177

Everyone else must do the rp after knowing about things on patch notes.

What now?

<3



RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - nevrozac - 03-29-2019

(03-29-2019, 05:43 PM)pulha Wrote: Here you have the best example of biased stuff

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=11947&pid=2071177#pid2071177

Everyone else must do the rp after knowing about things on patch notes.

with the annexation of aland increased system influence was nothing but expected
please check communications between core and bret forces before accusing someone of being biased


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - Sombs - 03-29-2019

It's okay. Admiral Kaze Dagon can move NPC assets.


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - pulha - 03-29-2019

(03-29-2019, 05:49 PM)Kaze Wrote:
(03-29-2019, 05:43 PM)pulha Wrote: Here you have the best example of biased stuff

https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=11947&pid=2071177#pid2071177

Everyone else must do the rp after knowing about things on patch notes.

What now?

<3

You need to ask?

All the stuff that as been discussed about everyone must RP stuff to adjust to what devs want for the story, but not for Bretonia... and you guys even rebute it isn't Devtonia or better yet DevDisco ... Even more convinced that this is for a selected few ...

It's simply a joke, and making fun of the rest of the community.


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - Kaze - 03-29-2019

I inrp relayed orders from my Fleet Admiral. Where in the knuckle splinters is that bias?
So yeah, I do need to ask. Unless you're going to tell now devs can't play the game and be 'play the courier pigeon.'

<3



RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - pulha - 03-29-2019

(03-29-2019, 06:33 PM)Kaze Wrote:
I inrp relayed orders from my Fleet Admiral. Where in the knuckle splinters is that bias?
So yeah, I do need to ask. Unless you're going to tell now devs can't play the game and be play the courier pigeon.

<3

And you surely are going to tell me, you being a dev didn't knew already that norflok would be to return to Cambridge??

Now this doesn't happen with the rest of the playerbase... and here resides the problem...

You could do the RP before hand, and i like it, it's how it should be... not saying it's incorrect if it's equal for everyone ...


RE: Poll: Should we have a redo Player Event at Aland? - Kaze - 03-29-2019

(03-29-2019, 06:39 PM)pulha Wrote:
(03-29-2019, 06:33 PM)Kaze Wrote:
I inrp relayed orders from my Fleet Admiral. Where in the knuckle splinters is that bias?
So yeah, I do need to ask. Unless you're going to tell now devs can't play the game and be play the courier pigeon.

<3

And you surely are going to tell me, you being a dev didn't knew already that norflok would be to return to Cambridge??

Now this doesn't happen with the rest of the playerbase... and here resides the problem...

You could do the RP before hand, and i like it, it's how it should be... not saying it's incorrect if it's equal for everyone ...

Not only I don't know that, because no one does, since it has not come up in discussion, a discussion that I do not partake, it is player driven rp that originated with the BAF HC. Unless you're going to call me, and everyone in the BAF HC corrupt and capable of predicting what will the story devs come up for the Nofolk in the future.

It may stay in O-3. It can go to the front. Or Poole. Or O-3. This is what the BAF HC decided to go with as it is evident in the link I have provided in the last post.

<3