+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+--- Thread: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds (/showthread.php?tid=126831)
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Mímir - 03-03-2015
POB's are of 0 significance when planning system changes - not everything is about you, believe it or not.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Parmenter - 03-03-2015
I'm with you Steve, but that would be taking away a System that Liberty can claim is still their own, through association of the name.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Stoner_Steve - 03-03-2015
(03-03-2015, 04:50 PM)Parmenter Wrote: I'm with you Steve, but that would be taking away a System that Liberty can claim is still their own, through association of the name.
The same could be said about using the name Kansas
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Sylvie557 - 03-03-2015
(03-03-2015, 04:49 PM)Mímir Wrote: POB's are of 0 significance when planning system changes - not everything is about you, believe it or not.Again I suggested a compromise that honestly makes more sense from a balance standpoint. There is two mining fields why not split them between two neighboring systems then just stuffing them both in one system that just happens to be enemies of one of the groups that have an interest in the fields. Honestly having a field in Kansas that junkers can haul ore from would be in the interest of Hellfire cause you know more junkers to shoot at in their backyard.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Jack_Henderson - 03-03-2015
Csn we PLEEEEEAAAASE... stop the Congress/POB discussion? You are burying every valid question about the redesign by the pointless discussion. Make a new thread, if you really have to discuss it in great length, then people who do not care for it can ignore it and this important thread would not be spammed with off-topic nonsense.
Seriously. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Sylvie557 - 03-03-2015
I was mainly making suggestions regarding the movement of the mining field described in the first post so I hardly call that off-topic but you do have a point about all this getting out of hand so I will shut up now lol
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Lythrilux - 03-03-2015
It probably would be best for a separate thread on the subject of Saltese to be made elsewhere.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - WesternPeregrine - 03-03-2015
Perhaps it is best to do so.
In a relevant topic, have all the houses lost their economical importance, with the addition of the alternative routes around the borders?
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Stoner_Steve - 03-03-2015
(03-03-2015, 05:36 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: It probably would be best for a separate thread on the subject of Saltese to be made elsewhere.
oh look, official faction leaders using color in text to make text more official. Deposit tears here please
Also, I'm gonna keep hammering on it, but please please please can the name Humboldt remain as a system name
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Sylvie557 - 03-03-2015
As long as it doesn't replace Kansas' name 8|