Discovery Gaming Community
Rules Clarification Thread - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Forum: Official Disco Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=306)
+---- Thread: Rules Clarification Thread (/showthread.php?tid=140171)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


RE: Rules Clarification Thread - rwx - 08-23-2024

====================
RULE: 2.0 - Every ship must have one ID equipped, and play in a way that represents the role of that ID. [...]
QUESTION: Is it allowed to be in the same player group with hostile faction players against a third party? (e.g. Bounty Hunters + Order vs. Nomads)
====================
ADMIN/MOD ANSWER: It is generally unacceptable to group up with factions that you are hostile with, even if during an engagement/encounter with Nomads. However, in your example, it would be acceptable iRP for Core/Order to not engage to prioritise engaging Nomads.


RE: Rules Clarification Thread - rwx - 10-16-2024

====================
RULE: 2.0 - Every ship must have one ID equipped, and play in a way that represents the role of that ID. [...]
QUESTION:
Is the ID line
  • - Can attack ships considered hostile by <house>.
Refering to the ID of the player or the ship type itself?
Can a ship, which is hostile to the house, but using a neutral ID, enganged with proper role play reason?
====================
ADMIN/MOD ANSWER: Players cannot straight up attack other players if they are using ship technologies hostile to any of the Houses.


RE: Rules Clarification Thread - rwx - 11-15-2024

====================
RULE: Pob Commodities
QUESTION:
- Are pinned contraband items known inRP?
- Is the "someone docks on POB" or "leaves a POB" with contraband passage still valid?
====================
ADMIN/MOD ANSWER:


RE: Rules Clarification Thread - sindroms - 11-15-2024

====================
RULE: -
QUESTION: This came up in a recent discussion unrelated to any particular incident, but please consider making a pinned topic in the sanction discussion/vote section (read: visible to any current party participating in voting) and a google doc, where each server rule has a subsection that has linked TL'DR to already enforced clarifications with a link to the corresponding post in this thread. We never got around to it back in the day, but it should reduce situations where a sanction was voted upon in a way to contradicts an answer in this thread, especially if the clarification was made by a team that has gone through a turnover.
====================
ADMIN/MOD ANSWER:(Leave blank for Admin/Mod comment)