+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: New Coalition Shipline (/showthread.php?tid=41368)
New Coalition Shipline - Politus - 06-24-2010
I concur with the above two posts.
Anyway, I still think that any Coalition ship which is a throwback to the Starlancer originals is a step in the right direction.:D
New Coalition Shipline - Hidamari - 06-24-2010
I like the coalition ships that already exist, and after watching and recording them fight using the tech they alreay have... they really dont need these ships. they do just fine without them.
New Coalition Shipline - bluntpencil2001 - 06-24-2010
' Wrote:I like the coalition ships that already exist, and after watching and recording them fight using the tech they alreay have... they really dont need these ships. they do just fine without them.You may have recorded the Coalition's best pilots against sub-par pilots. You can make up for shoddy equipment with a lot of practice, but against an opponent of equal skill and normal equipment, you're toast.
New Coalition Shipline - arvg - 06-24-2010
You should try piloting one. Then you will understand.
New Coalition Shipline - Sprolf - 06-24-2010
' Wrote:You may have recorded the Coalition's best pilots against sub-par pilots.
This was pretty much the case.
Those were our aces...
New Coalition Shipline - Dennis Jameson - 06-24-2010
' Wrote:thinly veiled sarcasm will be returned in kind. It's a ship introduction for the models, NOT a balance thread. This is now either the second or third time you've been told this in this thread Mr. Jameson, so either comprehend or just flat get booted.
Thank you and have a nice day.
Why, I'm speaking of the model itself, not the stat balancing that will be done at a later date... Or perhaps you just enjoy falling back on "no u" arguments combined with threats of application of your moderator powers just because you don't enjoy that somebody dares to ask questions of this nature.
As an alternative: Why not just answer the question? Why doesn't the Insurgent have an undercarriage like the Sabre in order to make it more like a very heavy fighter and less than a Kusari fighter?
New Coalition Shipline - Altaris - 06-24-2010
' Wrote:You may have recorded the Coalition's best pilots against sub-par pilots. You can make up for shoddy equipment with a lot of practice, but against an opponent of equal skill and normal equipment, you're toast.
PvP factor. Nothing else. I have nothing against these new models. But exchanging the current ones just because "they suck in PvP" isnt really rellevant reason.
New Coalition Shipline - Curios - 06-24-2010
Using that reason i demanding new model for Pretorian, legate and imperator gunboat
![[Image: emoticon-0176-smoke.gif]](http://www.skypeclub.ru/i/emoticons/emoticon-0176-smoke.gif)
New Coalition Shipline - Turkish - 06-24-2010
' Wrote:PvP factor. Nothing else. I have nothing against these new models. But exchanging the current ones just because "they suck in PvP" isnt really rellevant reason.
It isn't that they suck, it's that there isn't a way to positively balance them. Hitbox and model issues makes giving them any advantage a seriously difficult task.
Fly a Partisan for an hour or two, you'll see what I mean.
New Coalition Shipline - Curios - 06-24-2010
Giv one to my merc plox, we'll see how it works.