+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Liberty (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=71)
+----- Forum: [LN] (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=715)
+----- Thread: Liberty Navy [LN] Feedback Thread (/showthread.php?tid=11128)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Haste - 07-15-2017
PvP is RP
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Arbs - 07-15-2017
I'll take a better look at it. Thanks for the feedback.
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - SnakThree - 08-17-2017
Just a minor itch of mine. Why is Navy admiral fining law breakers on forums? This seems like a task for LPI. Maybe it's just purist in me thinking that factions should stick to their main roles much as possible.
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Arbs - 08-17-2017
Since it was reported to us, we might as well process it. Yes the Navy's role is taking care of the border and national defense from threats, internal or external, however there's been plenty of cases in which the navy has had to fill in for the role in the past as well for varying reasons. Call it for the sake of the need of being practical and getting things done.
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Techpriest - 08-17-2017
(08-17-2017, 07:55 AM)SnakThree Wrote: Just a minor itch of mine. Why is Navy admiral fining law breakers on forums? This seems like a task for LPI. Maybe it's just purist in me thinking that factions should stick to their main roles much as possible.
Because every House lives in a martial law which justified the House military to even interfere with police matters.
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Arbs - 08-17-2017
(08-17-2017, 08:19 AM)Techpriest Wrote:(08-17-2017, 07:55 AM)SnakThree Wrote: Just a minor itch of mine. Why is Navy admiral fining law breakers on forums? This seems like a task for LPI. Maybe it's just purist in me thinking that factions should stick to their main roles much as possible.
Because every House lives in a martial state and thus the Navy must step in to be police as well.
This is a feedback thread not a discussion thread. I can respond to my own feedback and I don't think anyone asked for your insight either.
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Blackvertigo1 - 09-04-2017
Sooooo.... Reason all these years I've been casted-out from the official faction is reason pending.... Why?
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Arbs - 09-04-2017
Hey. You were denied because we believe that you do not fit in in our expectations for members of this faction.
From what i remember, you thought i recomended you to join, which was a misunderstanding on your part. So its not a matter of anything, but we simply dont find you fitting in in this faction.
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - Durandal - 12-16-2017
I didn't hugely appreciate a carrier's offer of help to shoot three snubs being responded to with a "Sure"
Your guys had two Guardians. We had a Waran, an Upholder, and a Scimitar. :|
RE: Liberty Navy [LN] - KamiFaby - 12-16-2017
Since I was the one who accepted the help, I might as well answer.
So, I was not amused by the fact that you had brought in a LF and therefor I had accepted the Carrier's help. Looking back at it, I realized that it was overkill and completely unnecessary. I guess my hate of fighting LF decided it would be a good idea to bring in the carrier.
Sorry for getting the Carrier into this.