Discovery Gaming Community
Outcast Snubline Models, HF, VHF, Bomber - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Outcast Snubline Models, HF, VHF, Bomber (/showthread.php?tid=75251)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14


RE: Outcast Snubline Models, HF, VHF, Bomber - massdriver - 12-25-2012

(12-25-2012, 01:46 PM)Ander_K Wrote:
(12-25-2012, 05:52 AM)massdriver Wrote: also signs are not red but yellow, sign image was taken from wiki


Please make screenshots of a final version of ships and post it here, if not inconvenient to you.

open thread page number 10. there's ingame SS of VHF


RE: Outcast Snubline Models, HF, VHF, Bomber - Ander_K - 12-25-2012

(12-25-2012, 02:06 PM)massdriver Wrote: open thread page number 10. there's ingame SS of VHF

I've already saw them, thank you, I was asking for shots of final versions of all line - LF, HF, VHF, Bomber, but I'm not insisting on. Your time is precious, more awesome models to make. Wink


RE: Outcast Snubline Models, HF, VHF, Bomber - Korny - 12-25-2012

Pretty. Though, maybe a bit stuffed and bulky. But I like it.


RE: Outcast Snubline Models, HF, VHF, Bomber - Alastair_S1D - 04-15-2013

Ok I have to agree with what was said by chenzo. They are nice ships and all. But I think an evolution of the Sabre design would have been better than a "Revolution" so to speak. I would love a VHF to be single teir like a dagger but a bit larger! (Yes these designs are just that. But those engines just kill it for me. They are too big and bulky. Shrink the engines enlarge the tail fins and get rid of the lumps and bumps and you will have a sleek dagger like ship.) Would love to see something a bit more maneuverable than the Sabre as I sometimes feel a bit outclassed against Eagle. Put all that into a design and I can guarantee you will have the majority of both sides of this argument liking this ship. I think that is all that is needed. A little refinement to take both opinions sides into account and then it will all be sorted!