+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: OC Battletransport. WIP, Mon (Done: AT) (/showthread.php?tid=139542)
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Skorak - 11-03-2016
(10-30-2016, 10:11 PM)Swallow Wrote: I have reviewed these designs with a fresh look and decided to retain them as they are.
For AT: removing the pods and replacing the space with hull, adding some frame to the top front to enhance the nose and frame under the bridge (basically, pulling it up).
For BT: Removing the pods and reducing the width by moving two hulls closer. Enlarging the hulls to cover the internal space. Some touches to the bridge and "ram".
When? Well, I hope that soon.
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Swallow - 11-03-2016
(11-03-2016, 02:48 AM)Black Widow Wrote: The BT I dont really understand.
The Cargo boxes appear in the middle of the ship with no physical means to detach from the ship structure?
Edited OP for you.
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Oldum - 11-03-2016
Personally, I feel like the AT doesn't actually look much like a transport. More like a gunship , a mixture of the Monate and the Interrogator ( LH Gunship ). Might be because I can't really imagine to compare it to anything. In terms of shape and all, it looks pretty BW to me, although unless making it something like the Salvager or the Raba maybe, I don't really see much future for it, as its shape with 6 transport guns ( according how you showed to place them ) might turn out to not be capable of much. But I'm eager to see how it goes.
On the BT , I wonder about it's purpose, cause if it's ment to be another "goods" transport, than what's the point of it ? If the plan is to make the OC and Sair shipline equal in temrs of ship numbers, than a train like the Essedarius would fit in the line more imo, but again, we'll see how and where it goes.
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Swallow - 11-03-2016
We all know LH gunship is going to go. I feel like making something to inherit its design, even though it wasn't an initial design (and make LH happy with this one as well).
As for guns / cargo, well, I should look more at it.
This, in first place, is an armored transport, not "carry as much as possible for the frame I have" transport.
So yes, I aim at making it of a Raba class or so.
The BT is as well. While Corsairs have a train for that, and there is a generic pirate train, I thought that Battle-oriented large transport is what could be actually made.
Would those be purely OC, or BW - is not up to me, but initially it was intended to make counterparts to what Corsairs (and other houses) have, at least in numbers of ships.
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Swallow - 11-04-2016
https://p3d.in/nxsfy - 1.1.1 ---> 1.1.2 (active, 95% done)
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Swallow - 11-04-2016
Is everyone happy so far? I think so. Tomorrow (if nothing bad happens) it will be submitted.
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Skorak - 11-04-2016
I like the ship. Now it would be interesting if there was like a gunboat and a transport variant. The gunboat would be slightly modified with the front tanks being armor too.
That would be just a nice rp justifyable thing but I guess we wouldn't be allowed another gunboat, as great as it looks.
RE: OC AT + BT. WIP - Swallow - 11-04-2016
No, I will just make a great Montane for that.
RE: OC AT (Done on 05.11.2016) + BT (WIP) - Swallow - 11-05-2016
https://p3d.in/nxsfy - Final (AT)
Look precisely for any flaws now.
RE: OC AT (Done on 05.11.2016) + BT (WIP) - Shiki - 11-05-2016
Excellent work, Swallow!
