Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 (/showthread.php?tid=98543) |
RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Ceoran - 05-16-2013 (05-16-2013, 04:23 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: I don't see why Kishiro and Samura are different to BMM, Kruger, IMG, DHC who have no-docking rephacks but are not hostile... just rivals. Corporate conflicts are a lot fiercer than in reality in Disco, e.g. mining factions can pirate each other, etc. I don't mind other corporate faction in a similar position voicing their concerns as well. Also, the piracy happens - if at all - outside of house space where the law enforcement isn't looking. Under the watchful eye of government and police we are all nice and friendly towards each other. Not to forget that the actual battlefield between most rivalling corporations is behind the scenes and not in open space. RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Xelon - 05-16-2013 (05-16-2013, 03:54 PM)West Wrote:Quote:Samura Industries Please keep in mind that with .87 PoB supplies and upgrade commodities will be of a different kind than today, Xoria said as much in his little Commodities update iirc. RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - West - 05-16-2013 (05-16-2013, 05:06 PM)Xelon Wrote: Please keep in mind that with .87 PoB supplies and upgrade commodities will be of a different kind than today, Xoria said as much in his little Commodities update iirc. it doesn't change a things since Quote:It's also getting even stranger since the local corporations won't find shelter everywhere while foreigners do.How you explain, gaijin on IC/other non kusari id.. landing on Samura base and half of Kusari becoming undockable for Kishiro. It's not like we land on each other bases soo often, but in case of emergency it's simply needed. and as was already told by Ceoran Quote:I don't mind other corporate faction in a similar position voicing their concerns as well. RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Karst - 05-16-2013 On the subject of competing house corporations landing on each others bases: In the cases of Daumann - Kruger, or Samura - Kishiro, it does not make sense for it to be impossible. These corporations have been established in their respective houses for centuries and I seriously doubt the house governments would allow them to ban each other from otherwise publicly accessible bases. Sadly, in the case of Gateway - Bowex, it does make more sense since Gateway is very new and has no leverage in the Bretonian government. From a gameplay aspect, this is very problematic for Gateway since numerous commodities and routes simply aren't available (for Bowex, it is irrelevant since the only Gateway base produces nothing but Consumer Goods). RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Evo - 05-16-2013 Quote:EDIT: Also, we VERY COMMONLY ally with lawful groups as is. It's not called "allying" because of, well, the rule. Which, I might add, makes no sense for xenos. If XA shows up to an RM/LN brawl we shoot RM. We're only targeted before RM is all dead if there's a few indies there that just don't like xenos. Edited my original post, just bumping so this is actually seen. RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Thyrzul - 05-16-2013 Good point in the second edit, same can be said about the Maquis. Just as you, AD, described, Quote:The Maquis are a terrorist faction RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Tabris - 05-16-2013 From what I've read there's pretty much no difference in ZOI in the regular Coalition ID and the S.C.R.A. ID despite the SCRA ID supposedly having the greater ZOI advantage. I propose adding either Kusari (RP reasoning: The Coalition views it as a Gallic Puppet put under the facade of a democracy and seeks to topple with hit-fade strikes against it's Military/Police assets.) or the Gallic Borderworlds (Obvious reasons, we wouldn't be able to hit the core naturally, but due to our NAP with Bretonia establishing Fuel/Supply lines is less annoying so our ships can go a bit farther however not far enough to hit the heart of Gallia itself.). The Omicrons would be the 'Third Choice' as the Coalition has always had an IRP interest in the Nomads and we have friends in Rheinland which we can use to launch expeditions into the Omicrons to bring back data to Mykolaiv for our scientists to analyze and compare to samples collected from the Wilde. RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - GrnRaptor - 05-16-2013 Liberty Navy/Liberty Security Force IDs Wrote:- Can engage and destroy any ships within Alaska, Ellesmere or the Zone-21 Minefield system that do not belong to either the LSF or Liberty Navy. I thought Ellesmere was the LSF Guard system, and given the server rules that LSF had every right to blow up anything there anyway, much as LN does with Virginia. Will these systems no longer be considered Guard systems such that we need this included, and if so, why not include Virginia? If Ellesmere/Virginia are guard systems then this seems redundant. RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - Landers - 05-16-2013 (05-14-2013, 04:57 PM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: ; dsy_license_fc_u_grp Unioners don't have their own cruiser, but they could use their allies' with nerf. I think it's a fair deal for a - mainly - small pirate faction (compared to hessians or LRs). RE: Proposal: ID changes for 4.87 - HassLHoFF™ - 05-16-2013 (05-16-2013, 03:34 PM)Duvelske Wrote:(05-16-2013, 11:19 AM)HassLHoFF Wrote:(05-14-2013, 05:00 PM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: ; dsy_license_helghast Was is it used as a powertrader ID in 4.86 that often?! I don't think so... |