+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: Firefly replacement. Done on 27.10.2013 (/showthread.php?tid=95363)
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - Swallow - 11-07-2013
Hey, you shall be thankful to the AD for him having two hands! And spare time.
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - dirmaster0 - 11-07-2013
This model reminds me of this ship from my old Tachyon: The Fringe days....
![[Image: claymore2.jpg]](http://tachyondatabase.8k.com/ships/claymore2.jpg)
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - Tankman - 11-07-2013
(11-07-2013, 10:29 PM)dirmaster0 Wrote:
Best picture ever... (Or lack thereof)
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - Druen78 - 11-07-2013
(11-07-2013, 09:22 PM)Swallow Wrote: Hey, you shall be thankful to the AD for him having two hands! And spare time.
I know I know, I wasn't serious. I'm aware that such things take time, and that time sells at 30000 credits in the Admins base
I just can't wait to get my fingers on that juicy ship 
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - Swallow - 11-07-2013
I wasn`t serious too, mate
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - Thyrzul - 11-21-2013
Merely out of boredom I was looking at the ship model on p3d.in, and noticed a small amount of lack of textures: That protrusion thingie grabbing onto what seems to be comms array antennae pointing backwards on both sides for me, where that thing joins the main body of the ship, there are a few textures missing. Excuse me if those are already noticed/fixed, but the model isn't updated yet.
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - al'Cauthon - 11-28-2013
I feel I am obliged to say this, but the Firefly transport is based off of a ship of the same name in a TV series, also of the same name. remodeling it like this would completely defeat the point of having the ship in game.
Don't get me wrong it's a nice ship and I'd like to see it in-game. But not replacing the Firefly. If anything the Firefly just needs a texture touch up.
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - Omega472 - 11-28-2013
(11-28-2013, 12:35 AM)alCauthon Wrote: I feel I am obliged to say this, but the Firefly transport is based off of a ship of the same name in a TV series, also of the same name. remodeling it like this would completely defeat the point of having the ship in game.
Don't get me wrong it's a nice ship and I'd like to see it in-game. But not replacing the Firefly. If anything the Firefly just needs a texture touch up.
The entire reason this is being done is primarily that. Ships that are references or copy pasta's are aimed to be removed entirely, and failing that at least modified to a fair extent. Coincidentally, this ship is entirely beautiful.
EDIT:
Er, not removed. my bad. But changed beyond recognition.
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - al'Cauthon - 11-28-2013
(11-28-2013, 12:44 AM)Omega472 Wrote: The entire reason this is being done is primarily that. Ships that are references or copy pasta's are aimed to be removed entirely, and failing that at least modified to a fair extent. Coincidentally, this ship is entirely beautiful.
EDIT:
Er, not removed. my bad. But changed beyond recognition.
Well in that case i would prefer they remove it completely and preserve the sanctity of the best sci-fi series ever. (Well it was at the time i watched it)
RE: Firefly replacement. Done at 27.10.2013 - Thyrzul - 11-28-2013
In what way is the sanctity of the Firefly series compromised by having this ship in-game under a different name and with a different model?