Discovery Gaming Community
{AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+---- Forum: Faction Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=46)
+----- Forum: Faction Review and Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=135)
+------ Forum: Archived Feedback Threads (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=484)
+------ Thread: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD (/showthread.php?tid=121676)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30


RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - nOmnomnOm - 01-05-2017

(01-05-2017, 09:10 PM)Auzari Wrote: There was barely any talk between us, I'm looking through the logs. He's kept silent for most part of it when I was on my fighter, beyond this:

[09.12.2016 04:23:32] 5th|LNS-Amenhotep: Kalh: I will Assist the Crown in removing this rogue from her Territory.
[09.12.2016 04:23:47] DeathCollecter: do you want something?

Here is where you are wrong.
Since you are saying you are looking at the logs, you are again either lieing here to prove your argument or you dont remember seeing me on your scanner.

I've seen chatter of you both working together. After then, you and Kalh pretend you just met.


RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - Vendetta - 01-05-2017

(01-05-2017, 09:43 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote:
(01-05-2017, 09:10 PM)Auzari Wrote: There was barely any talk between us, I'm looking through the logs. He's kept silent for most part of it when I was on my fighter, beyond this:

[09.12.2016 04:23:32] 5th|LNS-Amenhotep: Kalh: I will Assist the Crown in removing this rogue from her Territory.
[09.12.2016 04:23:47] DeathCollecter: do you want something?

Here is where you are wrong.
Since you are saying you are looking at the logs, you are again either lieing here to prove your argument or you dont remember seeing me on your scanner.

I've seen chatter of you both working together. After then, you and Kalh pretend you just met.

Then provide proof??????????????????????????????????????????


RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - Doria - 01-05-2017

The solution to this is simple:

AFC: no one "owns" any base in disco. Get over it.
GMG: stop trolling.
Everyone else: nothing to see here, move along, move along...


RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - The Archangels Fighter Club - 01-05-2017

(01-05-2017, 11:29 PM)Doria Wrote: AFC: no one "owns" any base in disco. Get over it.

thanks for feedback and some clarification.
will reword later


RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - nOmnomnOm - 01-13-2017

Pondering the issue about Newport, I have concluded the following:

Until the issue is fixed between the GMG and AFC in regards to GMG's message to take over the station becasue of a few cargo depots that were beyond anyone's control and therefor the "threat" of the base expanding, resulting in a dispute and hasted FR5... The Archangels will be claiming responsibility for main administrative duties of the station. This primarily involves taking a lead on communications from other freelancers or pilots in the area that are being fined and shot at for docking at the base from GMG, as well as dealing with unwanted factions in the area of Newport due to this highly defensive situation.

Once this situation is over and finished, the AFC will be not claiming full administration of the base. We will be keeping our OWN statement constant that since we are NOT freelancers, we wont be responsible of full ownership. However, the AFC will be claiming between 40%-60% of the base and becoming inRP high presence on the station (backed up in game due to our commodity found there too). We will open up a new watering hole for nice forum RP as well as have our communications of Newport changed into a thread for communications of neighbors around and what not. Turf wont be as strictly managed as before, and the AFC will become more passive to others that are around, unless inRP we have a reason to get violent or what not.

Further, sooner or later ill come out with some drawings for Newports Renovation, though it wont be for some time. I'll keep it as a side project and have it come up in parallel to my main project. Designs will be quite similar.

All in all, we will have a strong presence on the station, though I understand all of your concerns.
I hope this is all quite reasonable and understandable.


RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - Kauket - 02-22-2017

Quote:[21.02.2017 22:02:05] UN|Abomination: Mary: Everything that can be helpfull, like movements in Liberty Informations about Auxesians.
[21.02.2017 22:02:32] UN|Abomination: Mary: Or acces to bases , but that depends on where they are.
[21.02.2017 22:02:51] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: Well from what we are aware, they house themselves around inverness and communicate with the Hellfire. They have....
[21.02.2017 22:04:03] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: >...
[21.02.2017 22:04:29] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: >...They have fixed relations with liberty ... with whome i assume is that Captain Kalh guy.
[21.02.2017 22:04:45] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: Ugh.... I hate him. A navy that has a boner for smugglers.
[21.02.2017 22:05:14] UN|Abomination: Mary: Hm good to know wasn't he Comander or something ?
[21.02.2017 22:05:21] Death: XYRRELbKO was put out of action by a hostile vessel.
[21.02.2017 22:05:26] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: We've been recently... banned from Liberty due to them.... *chuckles a little*.


Hi.

Could you not metagame? (particularly the part where you fail to have inrp evidence as AFC has only visited it twice for the hostage thing, and only seen it around a neutral base - a junker station - which AFC know it's a 'friendly' or refuelling base to us, nothing more. )

Thanks.



RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - nOmnomnOm - 02-22-2017

(02-22-2017, 03:32 AM)Auzari Wrote:
Quote:[21.02.2017 22:02:05] UN|Abomination: Mary: Everything that can be helpfull, like movements in Liberty Informations about Auxesians.
[21.02.2017 22:02:32] UN|Abomination: Mary: Or acces to bases , but that depends on where they are.
[21.02.2017 22:02:51] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: Well from what we are aware, they house themselves around inverness and communicate with the Hellfire. They have....
[21.02.2017 22:04:03] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: >...
[21.02.2017 22:04:29] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: >...They have fixed relations with liberty ... with whome i assume is that Captain Kalh guy.
[21.02.2017 22:04:45] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: Ugh.... I hate him. A navy that has a boner for smugglers.
[21.02.2017 22:05:14] UN|Abomination: Mary: Hm good to know wasn't he Comander or something ?
[21.02.2017 22:05:21] Death: XYRRELbKO was put out of action by a hostile vessel.
[21.02.2017 22:05:26] {AFC}-White.Whisper[P]: We've been recently... banned from Liberty due to them.... *chuckles a little*.


Hi.

Could you not metagame? (particularly the part where you fail to have inrp evidence as AFC has only visited it twice for the hostage thing, and only seen it around a neutral base - a junker station - which AFC know it's a 'friendly' or refuelling base to us, nothing more. )

Thanks.



RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - Kauket - 02-22-2017

Your capabilities as a leader and as a player within the community has been noted.

Thanks for the clarification.



RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - nOmnomnOm - 02-22-2017

(02-22-2017, 04:10 AM)Auzari Wrote: Your capabilities as a leader and as a player within the community has been noted.

Thanks for the clarification.



Edit: I'd apologies if I was in the wrong, but sadly for you I made no mistakes.


RE: {AFC}- ||| FEEDBACK THREAD - nOmnomnOm - 02-22-2017

*Ahem*
I apologies for the gifs, whatever case I admit it was too much.

But please dont go on and directly assume I'm metagaming without proper evidence on your part.
You already know that I will admit to a mistake. The problem is, Auzari, you screwed up with your RP and handed me what i need for the sentence i wrote on a silver plate.
thank you.


P.S. No i wont show the proof.