![]() |
ZA: End war talk - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: ZA: End war talk (/showthread.php?tid=103684) |
RE: ZA: End war talk - Zen_Mechanics - 08-22-2013 (08-22-2013, 10:58 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Hey guys, I have an interesting statement: Golanski faked our response to his nomad policy, he then took one of my account's posts as an excuse to rage this war under the threat of "zoners secretly doing nomad stuff" - then he made a joint "strike" - with unheard of zoners, which escalated even further because ZA turned the bases to full hostile - First war ended where I was "talking with him" - then the phoenix started aiding the AIS ( who were self-declared enemies of ZA ) - Aiding as in " Sure, you may dock for repairs " - Then SolarR came along - and blah blah, look its all in the past - Lets do it this way : Contact me ( And not DAVID DVIR - theres a difference between David Dvir and V-Independence ) with what you propose and we'll work on from there - This formula should do the trick : "We shed too much blood, its time for us to mature, we hearby withdraw our offensive lines and pledge complete .. neutrality.. ABCD " Do you agree? YES - War is over, everybody is a winner. But, Golanski as in his char will not do that so easily, so much like the last two attempts I don't think he is capable of respecting these "Agreements". Edit 2 : for the early comment - Bud, Im not blaiming him in the RL - Im blaiming his char, Ive said he must be a nice person, but he shaped his char with pure evil and.. complete ignorance - Which is why any agreement should also include his faction. RE: ZA: End war talk - Shizune - 08-22-2013 (08-22-2013, 11:04 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote:(08-22-2013, 10:58 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Hey guys, I have an interesting statement: Tel im going to ask you to please leave this converstation before things happen that we all regret, cool yourself then PM me once you have, i dont care if your calm right now, im getting PM's left to right to tell you to cool it Admins im asking for a wipe of this thread, not to hide it but clean it of its rage crap thats going on please Also tel who is the current leader of the ZA so we can get that part at least across Edit then: Nvm this post xD RE: ZA: End war talk - Shizune - 08-22-2013 Also No he didnt lie, i saw the nomadic remains myself, i even docked and tagged the images RE: ZA: End war talk - UK1 - 08-22-2013 Sorry I don't always have time to read the forum much but I think that a lot of people really need to do there home work before saying we don't have any back ground story etc.... This is a link for our first rough publication when we were first thinking of going official. http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=96608 In there you will find all reasons for any bases and maybe even the Sanctuary main base head quarters... Signed MOW RE: ZA: End war talk - Dead Reckoning - 08-22-2013 Mow, in that very document you claim to have an "unshakable alliance" with the Order. Yet you held remains far in excess of allowed limits and sizes that the Order had very clearly set out before that. RE: ZA: End war talk - Zen_Mechanics - 08-22-2013 (08-22-2013, 11:17 PM)Dead Reckoning Wrote: Mow, in that very document you claim to have an "unshakable alliance" with the Order. Thats the meta-game part, he had no way knowing trhat. - infacT zoner guard-74 ( my bsae ) has 4000 fighter/400gb/104 Bs remains ) - but he CANT know that. Unless as before, he is going to use this ooc response as a RP response. Also, its really old - and not edited . http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=96608 RE: ZA: End war talk - Shizune - 08-22-2013 (08-22-2013, 11:15 PM)UK1 Wrote: Sorry I don't always have time to read the forum much but I think that a lot of people really need to do there home work Indeed thank you Mow and i ask you please to keep the rage-look-posts down while we figure this out also if i may please point out Quote:Unshakable Alliance This is what you need to go back to please As for the Order, it was a few nomadic remains, why cant you forget about it? Please contiune on anyways RE: ZA: End war talk - Nexus Ark - 08-22-2013 =Edit= Nvm Webpage didnt update RE: ZA: End war talk - Dead Reckoning - 08-22-2013 (08-22-2013, 11:19 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote:(08-22-2013, 11:17 PM)Dead Reckoning Wrote: Mow, in that very document you claim to have an "unshakable alliance" with the Order. I don't recall seeing them myself, but from what I heard and saw screenshots of, they were openly for sale in the commodity trader of that base. RE: ZA: End war talk - Shizune - 08-22-2013 (08-22-2013, 11:20 PM)Dead Reckoning Wrote:(08-22-2013, 11:19 PM)Tel-Aviv Wrote:(08-22-2013, 11:17 PM)Dead Reckoning Wrote: Mow, in that very document you claim to have an "unshakable alliance" with the Order. They were yes but forget about the remains guys really, be thankful the LSF or some other damn faction does not have them |