Discovery Gaming Community
Rote Jäger feedback thread - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: Rote Jäger feedback thread (/showthread.php?tid=108171)

Pages: 1 2


RE: Rote Jäger feedback thread - Rote Jäger - 12-06-2013

Quote:Important changes are coming soon which will answer your question, so do not worry!
These changes have been made. Objectives have been re-done. Take a look at the ships allowed and you'll notice a new addition. Different ranks are now allowed different ships.


RE: Rote Jäger feedback thread - LunaticOnTheGrass - 12-06-2013

How does your faction feel about the LWB/Unioners/Bundschuh?


RE: Rote Jäger feedback thread - Rote Jäger - 12-06-2013

We would remain slightly more neutral than the main red hessian army, but our relations with those groups would be similar to theirs.


RE: Rote Jäger feedback thread - Jack_Henderson - 12-08-2013

Had some interaction today on IMG|.
I can't complain really. It's standard "We bring Cruisers and GBs and pirate/attack" play in Frankfurt and later O7, fairly easy to shoot up/evade. So no problem here.

I always thought it was natural to ignore givecash mistakes and send back (at least a big part of) the money that was sent too much. It's not about the money. I don't miss 30 million, it's about the attitude behind keeping it. Can't say I liked that.

So... I sent you that irp transmission because the member I talked to told me to address you on the forums. So let's see where this leads.


RE: Rote Jäger feedback thread - LunaticOnTheGrass - 12-08-2013

I have a minor concern with your diplomacy related to the IMG incident (which admittedly I was not a part of, so I'm sorry if I'm overstepping my bounds).

The IMG are not explicitly listed in your Diplomacy, which would lend them to be considered Neutral by default, as it says.


Quote:We would remain slightly more neutral than the main red hessian army, but our relations with those groups would be similar to theirs.

So I must ask, how "Neutral" would the VWA Bundschuh be? Enough to be considered valid piracy/engagement targets by your group?


Also just one weird nitpick. One of your guys was apparently "camping" Mannheim Station, but oddly enough the station wasn't firing back at him, as you can see by his hull/shields being at full. Not really criticism, just a bit odd.


RE: Rote Jäger feedback thread - Rote Jäger - 12-08-2013

To: RHA & IMG
Guten tag meine Damen on Herren,
I must say I am rather shocked how you think of us and even have threatened us on private communications herr Anderson. But I shall answer your questions.

- Mike.wegge is not a member of our group, but I took the liberty to ask his view on the matter and this was his response.

Quote:If I see other vessels on my scanner belonging to rheinland corporations or any other nothing else I can do to pirate them for the good cause of the Hessians. Sure the HQ can refund it back to the IMG by the means of leadership negotiations. But what that IMG security guy did yesterday was more than stupid within omega 7. To openly transmit throughout the system to let everyone know our bonds between our two factions. To be fair with you Siegreichen, they ask for problems of the rheinland if they continue with these stupid actions afterwards. If they still want the rheinland military not to know about their bonds with us, then I suggest they act within rheinland and on system wide communications as an enemy within any rheinland claimed territory.

On the omega 7 case our ships were treated instantly hostile. Maybe because the previous encounter of the pilot Mike.wegge in Frankfurt, but it is no reason to respond like that priorly anyone is on any communication levels. You made a system wide transmission that there where hostile hessians and after you threatened us on private as mike wegge told already and on system wide communications with exposing indeed our ties with each other. If I am honest i think IMG are double crossing us. Just making advantage of both sides the rheinland military and us. You make it not only for us Hessians easy to expose you to the rheinland as you make yourself a sitting duck herr Anderson.

Also with your latest transmission to claim 2 million as a fair donation for our cause. What would the rheinland military think when we ask your employees 2 millions for a cargo and shiptype vessel and others max 15 mill for instance? Wouldn’t that raise any suspicion? So to uphold our secret ties with each other I recommend you to ask refunds of the RHA HQ as we cannot openly expose our bonds with each other within rheinland claimed territory or within local communication range of other non hessian or IMG pilots.

Further I like to add that Rote Jäger Schwadron has nothing to do with the pilot Mike.wegge. And we cannot be held responsible for actions other pilots make who are not a part of our group.

Signing off,
G.Seisburg


RE: Rote Jäger feedback thread - Independent Miners Guild - 12-08-2013

Quote:I always thought it was natural to ignore givecash mistakes and send back (at least a big part of) the money that was sent too much. It's not about the money. I don't miss 30 million, it's about the attitude behind keeping it. Can't say I liked that.

This here is oorp feedback.
No need to copy your irp answer in here.
And I would still be interested in the quoted part because that is of much more interest than some blue messages and imaginary credits in a space shooter. Stuff like that sets the mood in confrontations. So a comment would be appreciated.