Regarding Freeport 11 - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: Regarding Freeport 11 (/showthread.php?tid=118772) |
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - n00bl3t - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:28 PM)Sabre Wrote: Omicron's order character making threats against a respected zoner faction and his FP character, along with N00bl3t's co-administrator character, supporting such actions causes problems with running the freeport and relations with the wider zoner community inRP. That's a very jaded view considering Solar Runners and Phoenix have no problems with Tobias Parkes. Apparently neither did Dr Van Van Mojo (TAZ) or Dankien Moebus (independent). Your character tried to arrest and/or kill my character and I escaped. And now you're powergaming that I'm an Order spy and discussing claiming Freeport 11 for the TAZ. The problem with any "Freeport Admin" vote is that they are too intertwined with the Baffin thread on different sides. No-one actually neutral, ironic as it sounds in a Zoner community. RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Sabru - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:32 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: Your character tried to arrest and/or kill my character and I escaped. And now you're powergaming that I'm an Order spy and discussing claiming Freeport 11 for the TAZ. huh? nowhere do i say you are an order spy. sure, my TAZ char has suspicions, hence the conspiracy charges. Your chars fled before they could be questioned and either cleared or fully charged, and you claimed powergaming, which is a load of bull. As for "discussing claiming Freeport 11 for the TAZ.". now who is using skype talk without permission? RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - n00bl3t - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:37 PM)Sabre Wrote:(08-04-2014, 02:32 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: Your character tried to arrest and/or kill my character and I escaped. And now you're powergaming that I'm an Order spy and discussing claiming Freeport 11 for the TAZ. I asked and a moderator commented without doing anything about it. Gytrash posted Skype transcripts first, I posted it 2nd asking it be removed if not allowed. Moderator commented after. 1.2 rule seems to allow Skype chats to be used as evidence in showing powergaming, if we peruse the sanction forums. RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Thyrzul - 08-04-2014 Sabre, didn't you tell me you have already had a discussion with Nooblet about the leave of his characters? Edit: What I see is a few coincidental events and decisions based on misunderstandings, which would make a perfect inRP drama, but do we really have to do this on an ooRP level too? RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Sabru - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:42 PM)Thyrzul Wrote: Sabre, didn't you tell me you have already had a discussion with Nooblet about the leave of his characters? there was discussion, which i believe amounted to N00bl3t saying he was leaving the RP. RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - n00bl3t - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:42 PM)Thyrzul Wrote: Edit: What I see is a few coincidental events and decisions based on misunderstandings, which would make a perfect inRP drama, but do we really have to do this on an ooRP level too?[/color] I hope not. I hope Gytrash calms down and reconsiders kicking Golanski out of Freeport 11 as it's done purely OoRP. RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Sabru - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:45 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: I hope Gytrash calms down and reconsiders kicking Golanski out of Freeport 11 as it's done purely OoRP. Appointment of FP admins in done ooRP'ly. so, whats your point? RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Thyrzul - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:45 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: I hope not. Seeing other claims about both getting into said circles and getting out of it are based on ooRP procedures, said point doesn't sound to be too strong.
RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - n00bl3t - 08-04-2014 (08-04-2014, 02:46 PM)Sabre Wrote:(08-04-2014, 02:45 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: I hope Gytrash calms down and reconsiders kicking Golanski out of Freeport 11 as it's done purely OoRP. Sorry, should have added purely out of OoRP dislike. Edit: Anyway, CoF never had Freeport 11. RE: Regarding Freeport 11 - Thyrzul - 08-04-2014 What I generally don't understand is what the people of Freeport 11 or the Confederacy of Freeports have to do with Gallia when all the relevant parties are TAZ, CW and Freeport 6 from the Zoners. |