+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. (/showthread.php?tid=120562)
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Vredes - 09-15-2014
Welcome to Texas, where LR are allying with RM, even though their IDs forbid it.
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Fluffyball - 09-15-2014
(09-15-2014, 11:22 AM)Vredes Wrote: Welcome to Texas, where LR are allying with RM, even though their IDs forbid it.
![[Image: t4_LikeButton-main.jpg]](http://www.getdigital.de/images/produkte/t4/t4_LikeButton-main.jpg)
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - WesternPeregrine - 09-15-2014
(09-15-2014, 11:22 AM)Vredes Wrote: Welcome to Texas, where LR are allying with RM, even though their IDs forbid it.
That's a different point, LR are not semi lawful.
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Vredes - 09-15-2014
(09-15-2014, 12:11 PM)WPeregrine Wrote:(09-15-2014, 11:22 AM)Vredes Wrote: Welcome to Texas, where LR are allying with RM, even though their IDs forbid it.
That's a different point, LR are not semi lawful.
Thats whats makes it even a bigger rules violation
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Fluffyball - 09-15-2014
Shouldn't LR ally with LN against RM? Or RM with RHA against LN? O_o I've read that it was somewhere posted that they could?
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Derkylos - 09-15-2014
If LN is shooting RM and LR is shooting LN, is LR allied with RM? What if it starts with LR shooting LN and a RM shows up, do both liberty factions immediately have to stop and start shooting the Rheinlanders? What constitutes "allying"?
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Fluffyball - 09-15-2014
I dunno, Someone states back then that in case of LN attack RHA and RM are ceasing fire and crush LN.
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Crossroads - 09-15-2014
As long as they aren't grouped in-game, you can't really do anything apart from proposing a new rule to enforce engagement priority.
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Teerin - 09-15-2014
Allying in-game is when you cooperate with another faction to attack (or work against) other groups, then not fight each other once the third parties have been defeated. So if A and B say "Hey, let's shoot C" and after they kill C decide not to shoot each other, then A and B can be considered allies. Being in the same group in-game is also considered allying.
As mentioned above, Junkers can only ally with themselves. Zoners have a similar clause in their ID. I've seen (and have heard of even more) violations of both those IDs, but I don't think any reports have yet been processed.
The thing with quasilawful groups is that there tends to be a bunch more roleplay involved with the faction. Lawful and unlawful groups have more clearly defined roles (for example, RM and LR shouldn't ally because that's not something RM would condone, given that it's not some all-out war).
Groups like the Unione Corse, Hogosha, and even the Gallic Junkers, have links to other factions, both lawful and unlawful. They can work ally with these groups as it makes sense for them to do so in roleplay. Freelancers are also considered quasilawful under the rules, and can get hired by practically any group, based on their roleplay.
With luck that all made sense, and clears a few things up for you guys
RE: Lawfuls allying themselves with... quasi-lawfuls. - Derkylos - 09-15-2014
Kishiro transport and Junker bomber team up to take down a Xeno fighter or 2, and afterwards, the Kishiro decides he ain't gonna hang around to fight a bomber alone...has the Kishiro just allied with the Junker?...