+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models (/showthread.php?tid=125586)
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Sanctions - 02-04-2015
Whatever they say, the shape is quite successful. Would be a pleasure to fly such a thing, in case it would have balanced stats. I also hope that buffed SCRA will somehow improve activity in Omegas.
![[Image: GWHmbwm.png]](http://i.imgur.com/GWHmbwm.png)
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Haste - 02-04-2015
(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+
Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable SOVIET ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Vulkhard Muller - 02-04-2015
(02-03-2015, 11:09 PM)Pancakes Wrote: http://i.imgur.com/9ZZQCUr.png
A comparison between Insurgent to Guardian. Doesn't seem too big to me, to be honest. Maybe a slightly longer nose, but that's pretty much about it.
(02-04-2015, 06:00 PM)Haste Wrote:Haste why not re-balance it as a Medium VHF and our LF as a lighter HF?(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable RUSSIAN ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Sanctions - 02-04-2015
(02-04-2015, 06:00 PM)Haste Wrote:Yeah, see how satisfied SCRA players are with their SOVIET(wut-wut?) tech?(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+
Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable SOVIET ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
And, beside silly jokes, you perfectly know what it means to be slow in this game. It means to be brought down fast. Be you newb or greatly-skilled, tech matters. Everything matters.
As a side-note: SCRA != communism, they are socialists. Same went to USSR, once you're mentioning it.
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Vulkhard Muller - 02-04-2015
(02-04-2015, 06:37 PM)Sanctions Wrote:Please Note Sanc, we have been pretty much begging for faster ships for as long as I can remember.(02-04-2015, 06:00 PM)Haste Wrote:Yeah, see how satisfied SCRA players are with their SOVIET(wut-wut?) tech?(02-04-2015, 03:08 PM)Sanctions Wrote: Reducing Insurgent's armour by several thousands, changing it's turn-rate to something like 1.1500+Insurgent is strong, sturdy, reliable SOVIET ship! Insurgent not a puny flimsy capitalist pile of crap like Eagle! You sir have no knowledge of COMMUNIST shipbuilding.
And, beside silly jokes, you perfectly know what it means to be slow in this game. It means to be brought down fast. Be you newb or greatly-skilled, tech matters. Everything matters.
As a side-note: SCRA != communism, they are socialists. Same went to USSR, once you're mentioning it.
Edit: Could you make a hit box comparison between the Insu/Partisan/Revo/and Scimi?
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Sanctions - 02-04-2015
Most Sirians are capitalists, it's no wonder they ignore you. Hue.
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Jinx - 02-07-2015
( http://p3d.in/1pOjF )
( http://p3d.in/IeMLU )[/align=center]
Here are two concepts that incorporate those desired vertical wings. I should say that i like the models i made some months ago 1000x better - but sadly they exceeded the polygon limitations. Those meshes are fairly crude and blocky but maybe they ll do
[align=center]just as a comparison ... http://p3d.in/0xnla ... it is so much nicer imo - but what can you do... .
( http://p3d.in/IeMLU )[/align=center]
Here are two concepts that incorporate those desired vertical wings. I should say that i like the models i made some months ago 1000x better - but sadly they exceeded the polygon limitations. Those meshes are fairly crude and blocky but maybe they ll do
[align=center]just as a comparison ... http://p3d.in/0xnla ... it is so much nicer imo - but what can you do... .
If such a mesh is being used - you ll run into pretty much the same "problems" you had with Xings first batch of models. - Those models are fairly large. From the side - at least as large as the AP line BHG snubs - but more massive from the front, too - and not much shorter.
But before that thread gets no concepts - there you are.
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Tabris - 02-07-2015
Links broken.
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Fluffyball - 02-07-2015
On the other hand, Gaians require a rather new class ship for Chammy, due to the card, in which it would be able to have VHF weps, huge agility BUT weak armor and able to mount class 8/9 shields, due to the specific nature of their warfare.
RE: [WANTED] New Coalition Ship Models - Corile - 02-07-2015
Quote:due to the card, in which it would be able to have VHF weps, huge agility BUT weak armor and able to mount class 8/9 shields, due to the specific nature of their warfare.Unique ships?
Ain't nobody got time for that.