Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) (/showthread.php?tid=125985) |
RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Pancakes - 02-11-2015 (02-11-2015, 03:44 PM)Toris James Gray Wrote: Conclussion: He's dead too. At least the original one. Now it's his brother or something. RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Shinju - 02-11-2015 I always said Cori for Empress... Btw, I don't know if it's a good idea with Carrier now. I am quite enjoying my RP encounters even if I am indie flying silly Chimmy and Templar. RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Fluffyball - 02-11-2015 (02-11-2015, 05:02 PM)Shinju Wrote: I always said Cori for Empress... I believe it's more about that Exiles do not have much firepower right now. However, it would be neat to see a pseudo-carrier made from e.g. Heavy Tanker (two slots), but Exile ID cannot have ship bigger than 4300. What's the reason behind that? It would be more logical for them to repurpose bigger civilian vessels into warships, rather than gaining access to the actual warships. Anyhow, I like the idea. Why not to make something dessie-sized, what would be technically still a heavy destroyer class, but in role it would be light battlecarrier. Think of something like Tarawa Class. RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Hidamari - 02-11-2015 Why are there no pictures in the OP :S RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Pancakes - 02-11-2015 (02-11-2015, 05:44 PM)Hidamari Wrote: Why are there no pictures in the OP :S It's a suggestion to make a ship, not a made one. RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Hidamari - 02-11-2015 v.v oh... well..... eeeh, how would exiles even get such a ship anyways. bleh nevermind RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Corile - 02-11-2015 Quote:I believe it's more about that Exiles do not have much firepower right now. However, it would be neat to see a pseudo-carrier made from e.g. Heavy Tanker (two slots), but Exile ID cannot have ship bigger than 4300. What's the reason behind that? It would be more logical for them to repurpose bigger civilian vessels into warships, rather than gaining access to the actual warships/That was LITERALLY said in the third post of this thread. How about you read and stick to the topic instead of bringing out lore in a thread that's clearly just a ship suggestion? RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Fluffyball - 02-11-2015 (02-11-2015, 05:46 PM)Pancakes Wrote:(02-11-2015, 05:44 PM)Hidamari Wrote: Why are there no pictures in the OP :S Ye. Repurposed Pilgrim Liner would be good. RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - S A D B O Y - 02-11-2015 I think [ALG] made a Pilgrim with 2 docking modules that could hold like GBs or something. Luxury Liners are pretty well armed and armored, so why not try and contract DSE or something for one? RE: Concept: "Imagawa"-class Light Carrier (Exiles/Council) - Cashew - 02-11-2015 To be honest, I think having these ships readily available is a silly idea. I'd rather this carrier be a SRP than just purchasing it since Exiles have hardly any resources. They'd have to rely on Colonials or Council heavily to build the ship. It's a nice idea though - it could definitely contribute to activity and such things. One thing though, would the Council be able to spare some space to build it? What could the Exiles give in return? |