+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: The Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Flood (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Thread: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? (/showthread.php?tid=133669)
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - n00bl3t - 12-07-2015
Perhaps I should have posted this in the new shiny administrator/moderation subforum, but I thought a rules discussion would be best first. (I'm not too sure how that subforum works either.)
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - n00bl3t - 06-16-2016
discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=73934
Any word on this continuing trend?
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - pillow - 06-16-2016
(12-07-2015, 05:58 AM)Texas.Red Wrote: Trigger happy mods with nothing better to do? I dont know. I dont see a point unless it genuinely violates a rule, or is somewhat offensive.
(12-07-2015, 10:03 AM)Phantom Wrote: "Trigger-happy mods with nothing better to do."
Would've quoted, but I'm on my phone and can't be arsed.
Well, I'm on my PC now and can, in fact, quote.
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - Swifty - 06-16-2016
Go away both of you. Vanish.
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - DarthBindo - 06-17-2016
(06-16-2016, 06:45 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=73934Interestingly enough, gravedigging a thread is neither explicitly nor implicitly in violation of the stated forum rules, which means we would be operating inside the "common law" area of Discovery, so to speak.
Any word on this continuing trend?
We would then have to question why a prohibition against gravedigging exists inside of Internet culture.
But frankly,
(12-07-2015, 10:03 AM)Phantom Wrote: I'm on my phone and can't be arsed.So let's just let it be.
(12-07-2015, 07:34 AM)sindroms Wrote: The same reason why we roll our eyes whenever someone says that 84 was better..84 was the golden age of Discovery and you know it. We can only hope to touch that golden brilliance once more.
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - n00bl3t - 06-17-2016
(06-17-2016, 03:58 AM)DarthBindo Wrote:(06-16-2016, 06:45 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=73934Interestingly enough, gravedigging a thread is neither explicitly nor implicitly in violation of the stated forum rules, which means we would be operating inside the "common law" area of Discovery, so to speak.
Any word on this continuing trend?
We would then have to question why a prohibition against gravedigging exists inside of Internet culture.
Well, since we just had a revision of rules and all, it does bear review. (Especially since the motivation seems to be less work/more efficiency.)
Previous precedent doesn't seem to be that good an argument for a subforum in which primarily nonsense is posted amongst the new posts anyway and +1 doesn't count.
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - Mephistoles - 06-17-2016
I think it's pretty simple
Things like the above link are just being an annoying little shit
Don't be an annoying little shit
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - n00bl3t - 06-17-2016
(06-17-2016, 10:51 AM)Mephistoles Wrote: I think it's pretty simple
Things like the above link are just being an annoying little *****
Don't be an annoying little *****
It's Flood.
If you're annoyed and it's not against the rules, don't click on it. It's like 200% optional to the game.
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - n00bl3t - 06-18-2016
I've erected this post for some clarification. It's been some time.
Maybe Hannibal can shed some light since he seems to search through several arcane posts in the subforums no-one cares about?
RE: What is wrong with gravedigging Flood? - pillow - 06-18-2016
(06-18-2016, 05:36 PM)n00bl3t Wrote: I've erected...
see you in a day