Discovery Gaming Community
Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? (/showthread.php?tid=143938)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Kauket - 10-06-2016

(10-06-2016, 11:54 AM)Chrono Wrote: Thats one of the things I'm on about, yes. But I'm also concerned about their removing things from their sub-forum to make their thoughts about certain factions seem less... hostile.
what was removed


also no we don't have any core members in our faction, 95% certain (and no neither is k'hara, as amusing it is to hear it from people)

(10-06-2016, 12:04 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: Don't forget FR5'd by CR, LN, and I think LPI and 5th.

...I think that's a record.
Outcasts, Corsairs, Core, Order, BHG, CR, LN, LPI

but not LSF or order guard, so it's kinda silly to see them white

also do note that mean that literally every faction in the omicrons is red to us, excluding zoners. but same with Core, they're red to everything, even Zoners. quoting the comm thread, "making a deal with the devil" - diplomacy sheet needs adjusting, which i'll do after comms

it's the philosophy of the Core propaganda and brainwashing that is primarily hated, not the people itself. Nodtviet-esque elements are desired to be rooted out of the group. It's like saying I hate black people because I said I hate the BLM movement. (disclaimer; that's an example. )



RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016

(10-06-2016, 12:12 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 11:54 AM)Chrono Wrote: Thats one of the things I'm on about, yes. But I'm also concerned about their removing things from their sub-forum to make their thoughts about certain factions seem less... hostile.
what was removed


also no we don't have any core members in our faction, 95% certain (and no neither is k'hara, as amusing it is to hear it from people)

(10-06-2016, 12:04 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: Don't forget FR5'd by CR, LN, and I think LPI and 5th.

...I think that's a record.
Outcasts, Corsairs, Core, Order, BHG, CR, LN, LPI

but not LSF or order guard, so it's kinda silly to see them white

also do note that mean that literally every faction in the omicrons is red to us, excluding zoners. but same with Core, they're red to everything, even Zoners. quoting the comm thread, "making a deal with the devil" - diplomacy sheet needs adjusting, which i'll do after comms

it's the philosophy of the Core propaganda and brainwashing that is primarily hated, not the people itself. Nodtviet-esque elements are desired to be rooted out of the group. It's like saying I hate black people because I said I hate the BLM movement. (disclaimer; that's an example. )

"The Alliance" was one such removal, plus a few things were removed from your infopage as well. I think you nuked a few threads, the subforum seems emptier than last time I visited.


RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Kauket - 10-06-2016

(10-06-2016, 12:21 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 12:12 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 11:54 AM)Chrono Wrote: Thats one of the things I'm on about, yes. But I'm also concerned about their removing things from their sub-forum to make their thoughts about certain factions seem less... hostile.
what was removed


also no we don't have any core members in our faction, 95% certain (and no neither is k'hara, as amusing it is to hear it from people)

(10-06-2016, 12:04 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: Don't forget FR5'd by CR, LN, and I think LPI and 5th.

...I think that's a record.
Outcasts, Corsairs, Core, Order, BHG, CR, LN, LPI

but not LSF or order guard, so it's kinda silly to see them white

also do note that mean that literally every faction in the omicrons is red to us, excluding zoners. but same with Core, they're red to everything, even Zoners. quoting the comm thread, "making a deal with the devil" - diplomacy sheet needs adjusting, which i'll do after comms

it's the philosophy of the Core propaganda and brainwashing that is primarily hated, not the people itself. Nodtviet-esque elements are desired to be rooted out of the group. It's like saying I hate black people because I said I hate the BLM movement. (disclaimer; that's an example. )

"The Alliance" was one such removal, plus a few things were removed from your infopage as well. I think you nuked a few threads, the subforum seems emptier than last time I visited.
The only things that were removed were the poems, which had zero use to the faction and it's development and said poems were more of a personal thing. We told the person in question to use his own account for it, as he was using the HC account for it.

They didn't want to use their own account, so it was never reposted.



RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016

(10-06-2016, 12:23 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 12:21 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 12:12 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 11:54 AM)Chrono Wrote: Thats one of the things I'm on about, yes. But I'm also concerned about their removing things from their sub-forum to make their thoughts about certain factions seem less... hostile.
what was removed


also no we don't have any core members in our faction, 95% certain (and no neither is k'hara, as amusing it is to hear it from people)

(10-06-2016, 12:04 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: Don't forget FR5'd by CR, LN, and I think LPI and 5th.

...I think that's a record.
Outcasts, Corsairs, Core, Order, BHG, CR, LN, LPI

but not LSF or order guard, so it's kinda silly to see them white

also do note that mean that literally every faction in the omicrons is red to us, excluding zoners. but same with Core, they're red to everything, even Zoners. quoting the comm thread, "making a deal with the devil" - diplomacy sheet needs adjusting, which i'll do after comms

it's the philosophy of the Core propaganda and brainwashing that is primarily hated, not the people itself. Nodtviet-esque elements are desired to be rooted out of the group. It's like saying I hate black people because I said I hate the BLM movement. (disclaimer; that's an example. )

"The Alliance" was one such removal, plus a few things were removed from your infopage as well. I think you nuked a few threads, the subforum seems emptier than last time I visited.
The only things that were removed were the poems, which had zero use to the faction and it's development and said poems were more of a personal thing. We told the person in question to use his own account for it, as he was using the HC account for it.

They didn't want to use their own account, so it was never reposted.

Mm, well, that satisfies my curiosity about that.








Out of another bit of curiosity,what happened to Erinyes' lovely diatribe towards the Order regarding the Donau incident? Wasn't in your infopage anymore.


RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Kauket - 10-06-2016

(10-06-2016, 12:32 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: Out of another bit of curiosity,what happened to Erinyes' lovely diatribe towards the Order regarding the Donau incident? Wasn't in your infopage anymore.

The only parts that were culled out were references to the Alliance. Which was very 'eh' and not useful in any way. It made it seemed like we were the Alliance.


I can try to look at a backup of the page, I didn't do the revise. I don't quite recall the Donau mention.






RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016

(10-06-2016, 12:38 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 12:32 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: Out of another bit of curiosity,what happened to Erinyes' lovely diatribe towards the Order regarding the Donau incident? Wasn't in your infopage anymore.

The only parts that were culled out were references to the Alliance. Which was very 'eh' and not useful in any way. It made it seemed like we were the Alliance.


I can try to look at a backup of the page, I didn't do the revise. I don't quite recall the Donau mention.




Something about "Why didn't the Order tip off the LSF or call one of their billion pirate allies to drop the Donau before it reached Manhattan, instead of nuking it there and shouting." Then some other stuff. Can't remember, the infopage just seemed weird without this giant diatribe.


RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Thunderer - 10-06-2016

From the Core HC:

"Auxesia might be rephacked hostile to Core for obvious reasons but that doesn't mean if presented the oppertunity Core won't work with them. Core diplomacy can be very fluid and dynamic. Factions such as Auxesia aren't Omicron natives and therefore don't conflict with their objectives within that region. It's in the same sense where there's a precedent for Core and Nomad cooperation. Core are oppertunists.

This all culminates into a reason why The Core, unlike other lawful IDs, doesn't have a "cannot partake in unlawful actions" or "cannot ally with unlawfuls" line on their ID, due to their roleplay. Lawful evil is in this area that effectively borders on quasi-lawful."


RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Sombs - 10-06-2016

Uhm, isn't the shared data and removal of Kebok in Lost basically the initiation of the ceasefire? They are right now at it to change the reputation with Core again. So what's the problem there?

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=143878


RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Kauket - 10-06-2016

(10-06-2016, 12:40 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 12:38 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 12:32 PM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: Out of another bit of curiosity,what happened to Erinyes' lovely diatribe towards the Order regarding the Donau incident? Wasn't in your infopage anymore.

The only parts that were culled out were references to the Alliance. Which was very 'eh' and not useful in any way. It made it seemed like we were the Alliance.


I can try to look at a backup of the page, I didn't do the revise. I don't quite recall the Donau mention.




Something about "Why didn't the Order tip off the LSF or call one of their billion pirate allies to drop the Donau before it reached Manhattan, instead of nuking it there and shouting." Then some other stuff. Can't remember, the infopage just seemed weird without this giant diatribe.

It was this right? I found it on Google Cache, no idea why it's removed. I added it back in anyway, might have been an oversight since the section it was under was also deleted on the cache page


Also concerning the Core stuff, they may see it as an opportunity to either backstab, or to abuse situations out of. Like gathering intel that certain ships exist.

(10-06-2016, 12:51 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: Uhm, isn't the shared data and removal of Kebok in Lost basically the initiation of the ceasefire? They are right now at it to change the reputation with Core again. So what's the problem there?

Of course, Core are gonna still shake fists at us for stomping on their breeding grounds, (Omicron Delta, Minor, etc) - but we're primarily going to be keeping down on low profile out of detection, as the message dumps note in our section and with the comm to the AI.

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=133300&pid=1826101#pid1826101

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=143909

Can't afford to have an open-open conflict. Maybe a few Core vessels can go mysteriously missing in the background to profit from bounties - but not in the open. It's not quite the objective there. They're nothing more than background noise in the Omicrons.





RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - Chrono - 10-06-2016

I think you're missing the point of one of the issues here, Nyx. You allied with Core without your rep having already changed. To answer Sombras question, your alliance to wreck a POB isn't allowed within the rules as Alley stated. Using the allied attack on the POB can not be excused by, "Working on bettering relations" because it was against the rules in the first place. And also, I'm quite sure You and Vendetta are a part of the K'hara because I know of numerous occasions you've both flown their ships. So don't pull that bull.