+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) (/showthread.php?tid=162355)
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Durandal - 06-28-2018
(06-28-2018, 04:42 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote: Gimme another model.
I don't think I could possibly ever stress enough that this is not how art of any form, nor the development team, functions. You are welcome to make suggestions. You are not welcome to make demands.
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Kyoi - 06-28-2018
why do we need a new one xd
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Mr.Mike. - 06-28-2018
(06-28-2018, 05:23 AM)Durandal Wrote:(06-28-2018, 04:42 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote: Gimme another model.
I don't think I could possibly ever stress enough that this is not how art of any form, nor the development team, functions. You are welcome to make suggestions. You are not welcome to make demands.
Reread my last answer - I already asked the author to give the second option here (if you read more precisely, you'll see that I ask politely).
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Mr.Mike. - 06-28-2018
(06-28-2018, 05:28 AM)Kyoi Wrote: why do we need a new one xd
The old model is too "elegant." In fact, we must fly a warship. For example, it seems to me that the current model needs changing.
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Keller - 06-28-2018
(06-28-2018, 05:35 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote:(06-28-2018, 05:23 AM)Durandal Wrote:(06-28-2018, 04:42 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote: Gimme another model.
I don't think I could possibly ever stress enough that this is not how art of any form, nor the development team, functions. You are welcome to make suggestions. You are not welcome to make demands.
Reread my last answer - I already asked the author to give the second option here (if you read more precisely, you'll see that I ask politely).
That's still a demand and not a suggestion.
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Mr.Mike. - 06-28-2018
(06-28-2018, 05:39 AM)Krsnik Wrote:(06-28-2018, 05:35 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote:(06-28-2018, 05:23 AM)Durandal Wrote:(06-28-2018, 04:42 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote: Gimme another model.
I don't think I could possibly ever stress enough that this is not how art of any form, nor the development team, functions. You are welcome to make suggestions. You are not welcome to make demands.
Reread my last answer - I already asked the author to give the second option here (if you read more precisely, you'll see that I ask politely).
That's still a demand and not a suggestion.
It so seems to you.
Close the dispute better and go on to discuss the model. If you do not like something in my behavior - the administration is always online.
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Keller - 06-28-2018
(06-28-2018, 05:42 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote:(06-28-2018, 05:39 AM)Krsnik Wrote:(06-28-2018, 05:35 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote:(06-28-2018, 05:23 AM)Durandal Wrote:(06-28-2018, 04:42 AM)Mr.Mike. Wrote: Gimme another model.
I don't think I could possibly ever stress enough that this is not how art of any form, nor the development team, functions. You are welcome to make suggestions. You are not welcome to make demands.
Reread my last answer - I already asked the author to give the second option here (if you read more precisely, you'll see that I ask politely).
That's still a demand and not a suggestion.
It so seems to you.
Close the dispute better and go on to discuss the model. If you do not like something in my behavior - the administration is always online.
It's just very presumptuous of you, someone who's nobody, to see a model that has taken time and effort to prepare up to appropriate standards, feel as if you're entitled to "request more options". I'm afraid time doesn't grow on trees and that if you want a larger variety in models that could be implemented, it's time you started learning how to model.
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Spectre - 06-28-2018
(06-28-2018, 05:45 AM)Krsnik Wrote: see a model that has taken time and effort to prepare up to appropriate standards, feel as if you're entitled to "request more options". I'm afraid time doesn't grow on trees and that if you want a larger variety in models that could be implemented, it's time you started learning how to model.
+1
Now, someone texture and implement this thing already. I can already hear the Valors crying
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Cortana Clark - 06-28-2018
+1
But what is with the defected Labc's will they also get the new model or not since they dont really have a shipyard for that?
RE: Lib. Assault Battlecruiser - WIP (06-27-2018) - Skorak - 06-28-2018
It's a model change, no new ship. So those should change as well.