+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411)
+---- Forum: Official (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=550)
+----- Forum: Event Archive (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=274)
+----- Thread: [Official Event] Clash of the Titans - Re-run (/showthread.php?tid=168134)
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Reeves - 02-18-2019
Where's the redo of the New London event? Or are we catering to people like @Shooter now? If the team is going to pick and choose when precedent applies them I'm very concerned.
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Victor Steiner - 02-18-2019
Reckon I can show up for my Gallic Brothers.
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Thunderer - 02-18-2019
New London wasn't sabotaged by a hacker and Shooter is not playing any more.
PS: Nor does the Shooter whose profile you linked, as their last forum visit date was in 2012
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Reeves - 02-18-2019
(02-18-2019, 08:09 AM)Thunderer Wrote: New London wasn't sabotaged by a hacker and Shooter is not playing any more.
PS: Nor does the Shooter whose profile you linked, as their last forum visit date was in 2012
To the former, it was still an event with complications that might have turned out differently had such things not occurred and circumstances been made fair. There's been discussion about this before and at length, but the point I'm making is that if the team wants to redo this event, they should stand by their policy and redo the other.
To the latter, good.
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Markam - 02-18-2019
(02-18-2019, 08:36 AM)Reeves Wrote:(02-18-2019, 08:09 AM)Thunderer Wrote: New London wasn't sabotaged by a hacker and Shooter is not playing any more.
PS: Nor does the Shooter whose profile you linked, as their last forum visit date was in 2012
To the former, it was still an event with complications that might have turned out differently had such things not occurred and circumstances been made fair. There's been discussion about this before and at length, but the point I'm making is that if the team wants to redo this event, they should stand by their policy and redo the other.
To the latter, good.
Unlike the Council event, we found a happy compromise for the New London event, both win criteria were doable without preventing the other from being completed, so we had both criteria hit and people were happy (mostly).
The Council event, while I'm sure with a bit of fiddling you could try make up a draw condition, it would cause the event it be mostly meaningless (i.e both ships survived, back to square one), so we must re-do the event to put the thing to rest. I'm sure people will be upset if Council wins the re-do because "GRN won the first time!" as it is being argued by some. GRN winning will I am sure settle the dispute, but the fact that a Council win is going to make people upset is frankly disappointing in terms of the attitude. It happens sometimes in sport, you have to take it and move on.
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Lythrilux - 02-18-2019
GRN was not happy about that event lol, we just kept going because it didn't seem like we were going to get a re-run. Unlike this one which just seems like pandering. I agree with what Reeves said, there should be consistency.
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Dark.Star - 02-18-2019
Y'all stop complaining about number balance, have fun!
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Aazalot - 02-18-2019
Issue with Number Balance is that its an event that impacts the actual story. So its hard to have fun when your out numbered knowing that your loss will change the story.
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - TheShooter36 - 02-18-2019
What am I have to do with this when it was a majority who voted on the event @Reeves?
RE: Clash of the Titans - Re-run - Querious - 02-18-2019
Count me in, people. The Deimos gank squad will face a true eclipse in Provence!