+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Liberty (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=71)
+----- Forum: Liberty Navy 46th Fleet (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=650)
+----- Thread: Liberty Navy 46th Fleet - Information (/showthread.php?tid=182953)
RE: Liberty Navy (46th) Strike Force Information - Liberty Navy 46th Fleet - 08-31-2020
Find me a picture of a new LABC model and I will use it
So far I can’t find one anywhere that is suitable for the way the ships are displayed on the page
RE: Liberty Navy (46th) Strike Force Information - Liberty Navy 46th Fleet - 09-01-2020
Page updated making the tag the 46th| and also adding the rank of Ensign
RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - Kanzler Niemann - 10-29-2020
Why do you have a Fleet Admiral as 1ic rank if ur only a strike group?
RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - romeodarkbeat - 10-29-2020
Carrier Strike groups composed of a single carrier and a few supoorting vessels are commanded by rear admirals, and we're way bigger than that.
Thank you for caring and sending feedback anyway.
RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - Kanzler Niemann - 10-29-2020
(10-29-2020, 02:26 PM)romeodarkbeat Wrote: Carrier Strike groups composed of a single carrier and a few supoorting vessels are commanded by rear admirals, and we're way bigger than that.
Thank you for caring and sending feedback anyway.
Why do you have a Fleet Admiral as 1ic rank if ur only a strike group?
RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - Toaster - 10-29-2020
Nowhere does it actually say that they are a strike group. They call themselves a strike force, which is a generic term without specific military definitions.
RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - Kanzler Niemann - 10-29-2020
(10-29-2020, 02:35 PM)Toaster Wrote: Nowhere does it actually say that they are a strike group. They call themselves a strike force, which is a generic term without specific military definitions.
Strike force or group the same thing. This also doesn't answer my question.
RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - Toaster - 10-29-2020
(10-29-2020, 02:40 PM)Wasserdrache Wrote:(10-29-2020, 02:35 PM)Toaster Wrote: Nowhere does it actually say that they are a strike group. They call themselves a strike force, which is a generic term without specific military definitions.
Strike force or group the same thing. This also doesn't answer my question.
No, they are not.
Code:
A carrier strike group[1] (CSG) is an operational formation of both the Royal Navy and the United States Navy.Code:
strike force
noun
a military force armed and trained for attack.RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - Kanzler Niemann - 10-29-2020
(10-29-2020, 02:47 PM)Toaster Wrote:I like how you demonstrated that you are able to use google unfortunately you still haven't answered my question.(10-29-2020, 02:40 PM)Wasserdrache Wrote:(10-29-2020, 02:35 PM)Toaster Wrote: Nowhere does it actually say that they are a strike group. They call themselves a strike force, which is a generic term without specific military definitions.
Strike force or group the same thing. This also doesn't answer my question.
No, they are not.
Code:A carrier strike group[1] (CSG) is an operational formation of both the Royal Navy and the United States Navy.
Code:strike force
noun
a military force armed and trained for attack.
RE: Liberty Navy 46th Strike Force Information - Blake Wayne Van Leer - 10-29-2020
(10-29-2020, 01:47 PM)Wasserdrache Wrote: Why do you have a Fleet Admiral as 1ic rank if ur only a strike group?Strike force can consist of multiple strike groups.
However, you have a point, and just gave me a very cool idea from the Real Navy nobody in Disco has been using so far (even though it's a pretty much universally accepted and simple standard). I have proposed the change and it is now under HC vote.