Discovery Gaming Community
=BSG= Clan - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: =BSG= Clan (/showthread.php?tid=2063)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27


=BSG= Clan - TankTarget - 04-27-2007

Comm ID: John Kyle

"Well as benign as the action may have been, and the fact that it was resolved quickly mean little dipsite my pleasure to hear the latter. You should have at least talked with our leadership before entering and left when ordered for future reference. If you do plan to enter, ask permission and state course path and intentions before entering then your request will be considered."

OOC: You will be made to enter a group with the HF present so we can track your wherabouts. But I do not want to restrict anyone right now, we are sort of at peace.


=BSG= Clan - Panzer - 04-27-2007

Comm ID: Alexander Wingates

Transmission acknowledged.


=BSG= Clan - Exile - 04-27-2007

' Wrote:Comm ID: Kaine
To: BSG

Roger that, BSG. We thought you may be conducting intel for the SA, or something like that.

No, we did not, neither will we.

They canceld our alliance for a reason, so we shall not help them atm.



=BSG= Clan - The Damned - 04-27-2007

Sir, this is Starbuck here.
I'm doing intell. missions for BSG in new territories.
=OOC= Hehe arrived in Sofia and stuff...man startin' to miss things already...ahhh where is my beer?

Salute and Bucky out!

*Fires up them Viper's engines like a firecracker...*


=BSG= Clan - OsoRojo - 04-27-2007

Transmit........

To:BSG

Comm ID: Richmond HQ

Greetings,

We did not cancel our alliance. You stated your neutrality so matched your stance and since then we have stated many times that we are willing to talk. In addition, we have yet to receive any apology for your reaction to false claims by the other House, which you based your actions on.

Our affection for your people has never dimmed.

South Alliance


=BSG= Clan - Doom - 04-27-2007

Dear sir, our reaction is based only on our alignment. IMG are mostly neutral faction. However, their conflict with BMM started KNF-BAF war. By rumors on IMG stations KNF and IMG stand together against BAF in that war. SA are allied with SF se we have conflict of interests. Also, we need to keep Zoners as friendly. IMG and Zoners keep Freeports together, so by default we cannot attack each other. In your place, i would really consider your alliance with both KNF and SF..they are at war and you cannot stay allied to both, or you cannot help any side in that war without breaking alignment with other. We had that same position in AW SA conflict so we declared ourselves neutral to both sides considering that matter. That is only reason for that. Not claims by other houses.
Also, as long as SA and SF are allies and KNF and BAF are at war we will try keep neutral position. But i fear if BAF-KNF war escalates that we might even find our selves on different sides.


=BSG= Clan - OsoRojo - 04-27-2007

edit


=BSG= Clan - Septuna - 04-28-2007

Hey. I'd like to join the faction. I already talked about it with Exile and he said i should aply here. So here i am.

Septuna


=BSG= Clan - Firebird - 04-28-2007

' Wrote:By rumors on IMG stations KNF and IMG stand together against BAF in that war.

OOC: Keep in mind there is also an IMG installation in Cambridge and the news stories there are different then the ones in Tau-31 (one has news from kusari the other bretonian). I know that several IMG workers happened to be working for BMM but didn't like the conditions so they left and joined the IMG...now given their likely Bretonian background, would that portion of IMG be willing to support a kusari advance? Then again there's also the viewpoint of Bretonia turning their back on them.

I don't think IMG can be said to be an active participant in the war otherwise we would see BAF and IMG ships fighting in Cambridge, which we do not. BSG has the idea right that the IMG is in a completely neutral role. I would say that right now, IMG is in a postion where Holman is basically run by whomever happens to have the biggest ships in the area which at the moment is KNF (ie. they're stuck in the middle between two huge bulls and like a group of independent business men, they're looking out for their own self interests and riding along whomever happens to be winning or in the area). As for the view that IMG and KNF stand together which you see in the news, keep in mind that like a conquered country, the stories in that area would try to encourage locals to support the new authority. The news stories to see are the Liberty and Rheinland viewpoints since they're more neutral observers, although even their opinions would be biased politically.


=BSG= Clan - Doom - 04-28-2007

Quote:we would see BAF and IMG ships fighting in Cambridge, which we do not.

OOC:

Well IMG and BMM ships were fighting near Tau 31 gate in Tau 23 but they caused server crashes so Igiss made them not to fight each other.

As for BAF-KNF war we are keeping neutral and we are avoiding any conflict, for now. Our politics are very simple...don't touch us and we wont touch you..
And anyway, Outcasts gives us plenty to do...