(02-13-2016, 06:07 PM)Xoria Wrote:

(02-13-2016, 05:33 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote:

(02-11-2016, 07:07 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: ====================
Type: Commodity
Bug: Pueblo Station Doesn't Sell Magnetic Superconductors, the PoB build item
====================

Here and Here and Here

No, nor should it. - Xoria

I disagree that the only place in Liberty to buy Magnetic Superconductors is from a Junker Base, I would think that the Ageria base in Colorado would be more in lore than coming off a station run by scrappers. I would like the point brought back to where it was

I originally thought you must be looking at Pueblo Bonito, since the game files clearly show Magnetic Superconductors for sale at Pueblo Station in Colorado. I've changed nothing, so someone else must have removed it from the server via FLHook. I can't imagine why.

(02-15-2016, 05:50 PM)Karst Wrote: What is the reason for the widespread removal of water sellers? Is it to make POB supplying more annoying in some locations?

(02-15-2016, 06:33 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote: ...
This whole going in circles thing is a waste of time, so seriously who's butt do I need to kiss to get it fixed? Because right now both of you are saying "not me" and unfortunately "not me" isn't listed on the dev team.

(02-15-2016, 06:50 PM)Xoria Wrote: Water is sold on planets, freeports, and shipyards. If you can pinpoint any locations that have an especially hard time with that, it might be more productive than snark, which will produce nothing.

(02-15-2016, 07:28 PM)Karst Wrote: An example is Kepler, with the source changing from Ames to Denver. I'm sure there's plenty more.

(02-15-2016, 07:28 PM)Karst Wrote:

(02-15-2016, 06:50 PM)Xoria Wrote: Water is sold on planets, freeports, and shipyards. If you can pinpoint any locations that have an especially hard time with that, it might be more productive than snark, which will produce nothing.

I didn't mean to sound snarky, I was just curious why this change was made. Since water is nonviable as a trade commodity and its only purpose is as a POB commodity, the only consequence is certain locations becoming slightly harder to supply.

An example is Kepler, with the source changing from Ames to Denver. I'm sure there's plenty more.

(02-15-2016, 09:04 PM)Blodwyn ODriscoll Wrote: I do also wonder the purpose of such a change.
What is the reasons behind it ?
Another question that came to my mind, is why keeping sellpoint on shipyard and freeport. I can understand that planets might have a large stock of water, in oceans, glacier, rivers, and so on. But freeports and shipyards ?
And last one : the pricing of water seem also strange to me.
It look like the pricing is linked to the major supplying planet(s) of each house : the farther you 're from it, the higher the rpice is.
However it doesn't take into account the proximity of icd field in space, like the barrier nebula, for example. Or planets outside of house space that would be closer to a base selling water, than the main house space planet that the price is set in accordance to. ( not sure about that tho' ).

(02-16-2016, 12:03 AM)Thyrzul Wrote:

What's with station specifically built at the location they are at with supply source proxmity in mind? Can the removed sale points be restored? Can stations be relocated free of charge due to this change hitting them quite negatively without any owners being at fault?