![]() |
Wisp Innovations - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Player Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=244) +---- Forum: Official Faction Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=245) +----- Forum: Official Faction Creation Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=134) +------ Forum: Archived Creation Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=290) +------ Thread: Wisp Innovations (/showthread.php?tid=134220) |
RE: Wisp Innovations - Laz - 12-31-2015 (Please note I am trying not to be bias here) Personally I believe that this is a bit rushed. It is quite rare for a faction to become official so early and is better off waiting. Good Luck. RE: Wisp Innovations - Wisp Innovations - 02-26-2016 According to the new official faction rules, our officialdom period should end today. We updated the first post with the most recent information, you will also find the main information page updated. RE: Wisp Innovations - Jansen - 02-26-2016 According to the new official faction rules this is correct. However, according to the creation date of your faction status, you made this before the new faction rules were introduced, there is no note that these are retroactive, which means that the old rules apply. RE: Wisp Innovations - Laura C. - 02-27-2016 My two cents: I don´t have much experience with Wisp, but it seems there is quite a lot of roleplay going on so it looks good. But what I find quite worrying is attitude showed in this thread. In my opinion ability to handle feedback and criticism is important part of what official faction should be able to do. So it is really not good to see that there are more than two pages in this thread, mainly negative posts, but they are blatantly ignored and left without any attempt to discuss them by faction leadership and tell people your point of view, or you disagree with what they said and why, or that your faction changed. Basically some response. But only postst dropped by faction account are adressed to admins - thanks for adding to tracker and "knock knock, isn´t time to vote about our official status dear admins?" type of post. In my opinion you are undermining your request by this attitude. If I were an admin, I would see this as serious reason why to consider voting against your officialdom. RE: Wisp Innovations - Jack_Henderson - 02-27-2016 IMG has great roleplay with Wisp and it is time that Cryer has some official representative. I do not care much who of the contestants gets the officialdom sticker (admins are there to decide that), but we need an official faction to shape the indie faction and flesh it out some more. Some compromises might be needed, so that the official faction is not a too specialised nieche aspect of the whole ID, but I believe this can be worked out (or my perception is wrong, which could also be the case). And while I agree with @Laura C. that feedback could be handled better, it's somewhat unfair to focus on that one when you see how many veteran official factions handle their feedback. It's by no means exceptional. RE: Wisp Innovations - Corile - 02-27-2016 From my experience, forum feedback is flawed and unresponsive and it exists only for people to vent their sałt. Sorry, no offence, but it's true. The questions raised before have been answered on skype or pm, this is where I'd suggest directing any future questions or suggestions as I'd prefer to limit the faction's oorp presence on the forums as it serves nothing but frustration. RE: Wisp Innovations - Kruger - 02-27-2016 Before you proceed with this faction, i recommend you to change. Because this: Original link: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/MrHuds0n/91ad33769605bea2f6b2/raw/a8d8e7678ff8d1f0f6e0cc05ffa233ef7202fdca/gistfile1.txt Quote:It's hardly difficult to see that there are some official factions in Discovery that worked hard to become official and remain so. It's also hardly difficult to notice that many currently official factions have stayed official just because of time and have grown to take their officialdom for granted, absolutely disrespecting both the server rules and roleplay standards.Is not quite funny, there are 2 sides on every page. You just made this, because you got pirated by some krugers on a liberty corporation id. Does not give you the right to troll around and shout wherever you want. Sure you can point out your own view and there is nothing wrong with that, but remember that we are all humans we make mistakes. Your communication post to Kruger is merely because you hoped to get something in return, a sanction on kruger for your transports being attacked or a roleplay consequence. Something you did put quite clearly in the discovery leadership chat, please change your behaviour. It is a game, do not let it influence yourself or this faction you guys try to run so negatively. Thank you for reading, please pm if you want to respond. RE: Wisp Innovations - Wisp Innovations - 03-26-2016 We have updated the first post to reflect all the recent faction projects. Our main information post will also be updated after the decision about our officialdom. RE: Wisp Innovations - Vito - 03-28-2016 Wisp brings new opportunities to the Corsair Empire and I like that. Asking for permission from the CoE and choosing a corsair shipping organization for Sitka was also a smart move so as far as I can tell Wisp is moving in the right direction as far as the omicrons are concerned. Godspeed! RE: Wisp Innovations - Arioch - 04-12-2016 Officialdom request failed - Pm staff for details |