Discovery Gaming Community
Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Inter-House (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+----- Forum: A/)- Technocracy of Auxo (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=311)
+----- Thread: Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=142072)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44


RE: A/) - Feedback - Demonic - 10-23-2016

Dear Aux, please stop using untagged ships. While I do understand the reasons behind it and it is clearly not breaking any rules or RP, it is giving you an unfair advantage with a no way to defend against it. I do realize that's probably the reason you are doing it, but try to do the hard thing and look at it from other side. You are basically doing your factions agenda, while negating any possible consequences you could face, since unless you decide to spill the beans, noone knows it's you. Why do you have the tag, if you do not want face consequences? You are official, you should be better than this.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 10-23-2016

Are you saying you want to use the playerlist to avoid the interaction?


RE: A/) - Feedback - Typrop - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 07:59 PM)Auzari Wrote: Are you saying you want to use the playerlist to avoid the interaction?

I think more along the lines that they can't tell you're Auxesia, thus can't adjust their actions accordingly.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Demonic - 10-23-2016

Sigh. Why does it not surprise me that you answer with a personal attack.

No. I want you to face RP consequences for what you are doing. Whatever it might be at the moment. I'd apreacciate a constructive response instead of your previous one.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 10-23-2016

No, no it's not a personal attack, it's a genuine question. That's your own perspective for taking it as a personal attack, not my issue.


People use the list to avoid interaction. Or to hunt it. If there's RP consequences, then you'd know upon meeting the ship - because it'll have an Aux ID or act like one in RP, there's no need to constantly hunt down people via the player list.

Do tell me what the issue is. If people want to fly untagged, it's their choice. It won't contribute to the activity tracker though.



RE: A/) - Feedback - A/)- The Inner Phalanx - 10-23-2016



Hello.

Flying untagged is not against the rules, nor does it prevent RP consequences from occurring. The point of flying untagged is to be undercover, and the drawback is that said ships do not contribute to the activity tracker. Consequences of encountering an untagged ship still exist. No, we will not stop doing so. Yes, it makes us harder to locate. Our tag exists to identify non-undercover vessels. If they were flying with a tag then they wouldn't be undercover.


I hope this clarifies things for you.


-The Inner Phalanx




RE: A/) - Feedback - Trivjum - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 08:24 PM)Auzari Wrote: No, no it's not a personal attack, it's a genuine question. That's your own perspective for taking it as a personal attack, not my issue.


People use the list to avoid interaction. Or to hunt it. If there's RP consequences, then you'd know upon meeting the ship - because it'll have an Aux ID or act like one in RP, there's no need to constantly hunt down people via the player list.

Do tell me what the issue is. If people want to fly untagged, it's their choice. It won't contribute to the activity tracker though.



It is your issue, this is the feedback thread of your faction, if your words are taken as something they are not, it IS your issue and it IS your responsibility to convey your words in a manner where we can all understand what you're really trying to say.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Kauket - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 08:30 PM)Trivjum Wrote:
(10-23-2016, 08:24 PM)Auzari Wrote: No, no it's not a personal attack, it's a genuine question. That's your own perspective for taking it as a personal attack, not my issue.


People use the list to avoid interaction. Or to hunt it. If there's RP consequences, then you'd know upon meeting the ship - because it'll have an Aux ID or act like one in RP, there's no need to constantly hunt down people via the player list.

Do tell me what the issue is. If people want to fly untagged, it's their choice. It won't contribute to the activity tracker though.



It is your issue, this is the feedback thread of your faction, if your words are taken as something they are not, it IS your issue and it IS your responsibility to convey your words in a manner where we can all understand what you're really trying to say.

That's like saying it's my fault if I say the colour red and people think differently about the word, some think lust, some think communism, whatever.

I can't control the brain. Please don't be a justice warrior here if you have nothing else to say concerning the matter, that includes your opinions on my wording.




RE: A/) - Feedback - Demonic - 10-23-2016

You can thank your reputation for my assumtion.

Anyways. My problem is the fact that you are basically combining advantages of official faction and indie, with little or no disadvantages. If I see a ship on my in game scanner, my behaviour depends on it's name and colour. Those are fully RP information I have and the only one, cause no scanner can scan ID that far. If I know you are targeting ships carrying certain cargo, which I happen to have, I'll try to avoid you, jettison and shoot my cargo or something else. But if you are flying untaged ship, I am powerless. You are depriving me the information I need to react. And when you actually do shoot me down / take my cargo, I still don't know it's you. I may have my assumtions, but I can't prove anything. Thus I can't really react accordingly when I meet you the next time.

And please, stop talking about the playerlist. I got killed or pirated by hessians several times, even though I was aware of their presence in my transit system, thanks to the playerlist.


RE: A/) - Feedback - Trivjum - 10-23-2016

(10-23-2016, 08:33 PM)Auzari Wrote:
(10-23-2016, 08:30 PM)Trivjum Wrote:
(10-23-2016, 08:24 PM)Auzari Wrote: No, no it's not a personal attack, it's a genuine question. That's your own perspective for taking it as a personal attack, not my issue.


People use the list to avoid interaction. Or to hunt it. If there's RP consequences, then you'd know upon meeting the ship - because it'll have an Aux ID or act like one in RP, there's no need to constantly hunt down people via the player list.

Do tell me what the issue is. If people want to fly untagged, it's their choice. It won't contribute to the activity tracker though.



It is your issue, this is the feedback thread of your faction, if your words are taken as something they are not, it IS your issue and it IS your responsibility to convey your words in a manner where we can all understand what you're really trying to say.

That's like saying it's my fault if I say the colour red and people think differently about the word, some think lust, some think communism, whatever.

I can't control the brain. Please don't be a justice warrior here if you have nothing else to say concerning the matter, that includes your opinions on my wording.



You're comparing apples and oranges, we're not talking something ambiguous at ALL, your answer to Demonic was nothing more than a one-liner that bordered on being disrespectful and an insult.