+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation (/showthread.php?tid=161702)
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - Sand_Spider - 06-04-2018
Maybe Gallia just needs a cap sales point in Leeds or Tau-31? With how numerous their fleet numbers are portrayed in the lore, I could see Valors, Obsinates and Triumphs having a sale point closer to the war front at this point in time.
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - Sombs - 06-04-2018
To be fair, the PoB was placed in a place where it was super obvious. It was gallic by name and had no defensive aspects. If it would have been placed in Leeds' orbit, it would have had lasted longer - simply because Valor encounters. It could have been placed in any other place but not straight infront of Liberty's eyes, in an area where LN, CR and BAF have ZoI.
The idea was good, the planning not so much.
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - Lythrilux - 06-04-2018
(06-04-2018, 08:24 PM)Piombo65 Wrote:(06-04-2018, 08:17 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Newbies/lolwut/indies are all on the BAF, LN and CR sides.And when this!? While I saw only Valor lolwuts/indies??
Since GRN|'s passing the indie numbers has shrunk. There's a noticeable void left now, and the best way to fix that is by facilitating easier ship creation.
(06-04-2018, 08:24 PM)Sand_Spider Wrote: Maybe Gallia just needs a cap sales point in Leeds or Tau-31? With how numerous their fleet numbers are portrayed in the lore, I could see Valors, Obsinates and Triumphs having a sale point closer to the war front at this point in time.
A restart needs to be placed there as well. It makes all the difference if everything is all in the same system.
(06-04-2018, 08:27 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: To be fair, the PoB was placed in a place where it was super obvious. It was gallic by name and had no defensive aspects. If it would have been placed in Leeds' orbit, it would have had lasted longer - simply because Valor encounters. It could have been placed in any other place but not straight infront of Liberty's eyes, in an area where LN, CR and BAF have ZoI.
The idea was good, the planning not so much.
The general idea was that by having it in Magellan, it'd encourage GRN indies to take missions in Magellan and sell mission cargo to the POB for a profit. It'd create activity in the same way Invicta did. Although I can't say I'm confident that placing it in Leeds wouldn't have lead it to be insta-sieged by the LN.
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - Piombo65 - 06-04-2018
(06-04-2018, 08:49 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Since GRN|'s passing the indie numbers has shrunk. There's a noticeable void left now, and the best way to fix that is by facilitating easier ship creation.But now there are 2 Gallic factions: MRG| and AG]>
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - Lythrilux - 06-04-2018
(06-04-2018, 09:06 PM)Piombo65 Wrote:(06-04-2018, 08:49 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Since GRN|'s passing the indie numbers has shrunk. There's a noticeable void left now, and the best way to fix that is by facilitating easier ship creation.But now there are 2 Gallic factions: MRG| and AG]>
Player groups can't make up for a lack of indies. MRG| and AG]> are not large enough to fill the playerbase demand of Gallic War PvP. And as Thunderer said, half of MRG| is composed of BAF players.
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - TheShooter36 - 06-04-2018
(06-04-2018, 08:17 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Newbies/lolwut/indies are all on the BAF, LN and CR sides
Funfact: CR doesnt have indies at all. Either they are not-tagged ships due to insufficient rank or official ships you see, we tend to absorb all of our indies into our faction at some point.
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - Piombo65 - 06-05-2018
(06-04-2018, 09:29 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:(06-04-2018, 09:06 PM)Piombo65 Wrote:(06-04-2018, 08:49 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Since GRN|'s passing the indie numbers has shrunk. There's a noticeable void left now, and the best way to fix that is by facilitating easier ship creation.But now there are 2 Gallic factions: MRG| and AG]>
Player groups can't make up for a lack of indies. MRG| and AG]> are not large enough to fill the playerbase demand of Gallic War PvP. And as Thunderer said, half of MRG| is composed of BAF players.
Why not merge the Gallic groups then? Why not recreate GRN|? And don't answer me "OORP hate".
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - NoMe - 06-05-2018
if there is a system where players can't live, it's normal to have 0 who want protect it. Gallia law is to kill all! if i put my point of view, it's a faschism form!
GRN ship limitation battlecruiser max, after 6 months of war more, only cruiser, money obliged.
as the pilgrim liner, GRN must have a bad image on them
in real we can't change nothing, do what you want with them, i don't care.
if the reality is to permise to be like this
we can propose to sell liberty(unlawful included), bretonia (unlawful included), hispania, and yes you Outcast are concerned! the rest for rheinlander their south sirius dogs.
please give us the end of film
in fact it's useless to be opposed
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - Lythrilux - 06-05-2018
(06-05-2018, 06:26 AM)Piombo65 Wrote:(06-04-2018, 09:29 PM)Lythrilux Wrote:(06-04-2018, 09:06 PM)Piombo65 Wrote:(06-04-2018, 08:49 PM)Lythrilux Wrote: Since GRN|'s passing the indie numbers has shrunk. There's a noticeable void left now, and the best way to fix that is by facilitating easier ship creation.But now there are 2 Gallic factions: MRG| and AG]>
Player groups can't make up for a lack of indies. MRG| and AG]> are not large enough to fill the playerbase demand of Gallic War PvP. And as Thunderer said, half of MRG| is composed of BAF players.
Why not merge the Gallic groups then? Why not recreate GRN|? And don't answer me "OORP hate".
You're not reading what I've said. Both MRG| and AG]>, regardless if they are separate or merge (I think I've only seen 1 AG]> ship in the past three months) are not large enough to fill the playerbase demand of Gallic War PvP. MRG| in essence, is a recreation of GRN|, with support from BAF because 90% of GRN| had stopped playing the game and moved onto other things.
The Gallic side needs an influx of fresh players. The existing GRN players aren't enough on their own to solve the problem.
RE: Admin/Dev Suggestions to Increase GRN Participation - sasapinjic - 06-05-2018
Is it possible to have sell point in Leeds with Galic Capital ships with custom price of 1 M or so and intergrated CAU V and standard weapons , while power core will be at 90 % , that shuld solve activity problem , and boost activity , and at same time prevent money making from them ?
It will be Sorta like promotion ships ?
Later , if newbies like Galic side , they will opt for full Capital ship with proper setup .