(06-14-2020, 02:38 AM)Charo Wrote: Can you two take your lovers' quarrel to Discord? I mean I love watching drama but tbh this thing between you two is just sad at this point. But on topic: Chika wasn't a hyper-radical terrorist, she just did what had to be done :^)

(06-14-2020, 02:42 AM)Hemlocke Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:38 AM)Charo Wrote: Can you two take your lovers' quarrel to Discord? I mean I love watching drama but tbh this thing between you two is just sad at this point. But on topic: Chika wasn't a hyper-radical terrorist, she just did what had to be done :^)

The reason Exo brought this here is because Meg removed him from all her discords and blocked him. This is just a desperate cry for attention.

(06-14-2020, 02:44 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote: If it is a concern that will not be dealt with privately, then it needs to be brought to her attention in an official capacity. You have seen the result.

I did not want to post here, but Meg instead chose to put her head in the sand when I brought it to her attention on Discord.

(06-14-2020, 02:49 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:44 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote: If it is a concern that will not be dealt with privately, then it needs to be brought to her attention in an official capacity. You have seen the result.

I did not want to post here, but Meg instead chose to put her head in the sand when I brought it to her attention on Discord.

Doesn't Meg run this faction? If anyone gets the final say in recruiting, it makes sense it'd be her. Why are you making this about you?

(06-14-2020, 02:50 AM)Darkstar_Spectre Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:49 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:44 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote: If it is a concern that will not be dealt with privately, then it needs to be brought to her attention in an official capacity. You have seen the result.

I did not want to post here, but Meg instead chose to put her head in the sand when I brought it to her attention on Discord.

Doesn't Meg run this faction? If anyone gets the final say in recruiting, it makes sense it'd be her. Why are you making this about you?

Ego

(06-14-2020, 02:53 AM)Charo Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:50 AM)Darkstar_Spectre Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:49 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:44 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote: If it is a concern that will not be dealt with privately, then it needs to be brought to her attention in an official capacity. You have seen the result.

I did not want to post here, but Meg instead chose to put her head in the sand when I brought it to her attention on Discord.

Doesn't Meg run this faction? If anyone gets the final say in recruiting, it makes sense it'd be her. Why are you making this about you?

Ego

Orbit

(06-14-2020, 02:58 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote: Some expectation of lorewise consistency.

Meg once told me about how Japan handles internal dissent, and the point I was trying to make is that the process as she described it has happened to GC-. It’s a completely reasonable lore development, and my question is when such developments will be reflected in the faction description.

Everything else is just window dressing, but the personal swipes really make me feel like I’ve got someone’s goat.

(06-14-2020, 03:03 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:58 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote: Some expectation of lorewise consistency.

Meg once told me about how Japan handles internal dissent, and the point I was trying to make is that the process as she described it has happened to GC-. It’s a completely reasonable lore development, and my question is when such developments will be reflected in the faction description.

Everything else is just window dressing, but the personal swipes really make me feel like I’ve got someone’s goat.

Lore is not as important as having people to play the game with. If you value lore more than player cooperation and a sense of community, maybe you'd have more fun playing a singleplayer game.

(06-14-2020, 03:13 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 03:03 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote:

(06-14-2020, 02:58 AM)E X O D I T E Wrote: Some expectation of lorewise consistency.

Meg once told me about how Japan handles internal dissent, and the point I was trying to make is that the process as she described it has happened to GC-. It’s a completely reasonable lore development, and my question is when such developments will be reflected in the faction description.

Everything else is just window dressing, but the personal swipes really make me feel like I’ve got someone’s goat.

Lore is not as important as having people to play the game with. If you value lore more than player cooperation and a sense of community, maybe you'd have more fun playing a singleplayer game.

I'm not saying "everyone should behave like X."
I'm saying "the description is outdated, perhaps it is time it be updated to something more fitting". As an Official Faction, GC- should have a description reflective of its political status. They certainly started out as radical, but through player RP developments, they became more moderate. Nothing more, nothing less.

I am not insulting the players, their characters, or how they choose to play them. I am poat inting out that in a cult as presented in its information, the characters m therely appear out of place. It can certainly still work, but it's still a bit of a surprise. (also, again, the new guys are from another RP community, we'll see how they are when the culture shock wears off)