+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: CTE big ships. WIP (GB, AT done) (/showthread.php?tid=179411)
RE: CTE destroyer / liner / explorer / bastard ship / you name it. WIP - Grumblesaur - 05-08-2020
(05-07-2020, 02:23 PM)Felsvar Wrote: Probably something that can replace the Democritus
Why does the Democritus need to be replaced? A ship like this could easily exist alongside it. Discovery is fairly lacking in passenger ships as it is, so it wouldn't hurt to have another, especially something as accessible as a CTE ship.
RE: CTE destroyer / liner / explorer / bastard ship / you name it. WIP - Sabru - 05-08-2020
I like this as both an economy liner but also as a potential CTE battletrans as it seems like it might fit both.
RE: CTE destroyer / liner / explorer / bastard ship / you name it. WIP - Vulkhard Muller - 05-08-2020
(05-08-2020, 01:45 PM)Sabru Wrote: I like this as both an economy liner but also as a potential CTE battletrans as it seems like it might fit both.
Why not both?
RE: CTE destroyer / liner / explorer / bastard ship / you name it. WIP - Kokopelli - 05-08-2020
Democritus already has a neat stylish design.
Please, don't tinker with it
EDIT: at least, not heavily
RE: CTE destroyer / liner / explorer / bastard ship / you name it. WIP - Dark.Star - 05-08-2020
the last thing i need is a civillian destroyer
nooop thank
RE: CTE destroyer / liner / explorer / bastard ship / you name it. WIP - Karst - 05-08-2020
Just to be clear, if this were to be added as a Sirius Civilian tech cell cruiser-class, that does NOT mean that corporations, freelancers, or any other factions that currently don't have cruisers on their ID would suddenly have their IDs changed.
Simply that there would be a CTE tech cruiser available for IDs that do allow cruisers.
Edit:
(05-07-2020, 02:18 PM)Capt. Henry Morgan Wrote: That would make a nice non-luxury passenger transport in the 3.6k range.
You mean the Passenger Liner? That is a ship which exists already.
Personally I quite like the idea of a CTE cruiser, but I also like the idea of an economic passenger passenger transport.
However, it would have to be closer to the Geisha/Democritus, not the 3600 class, because of the existence of the aforementioned Passenger Liner.
RE: CTE liner and armored transport. WIP - Swallow - 06-20-2020
I am moving the intended-to-be condor replacement here and now those two ships will be as follows:
https://p3d.in/gasjv - Liner 0.1.0
https://p3d.in/wDtJm - Armored transport 1.3.3
RE: CTE liner and armored transport. WIP - Swallow - 07-14-2020
AT updated, discussion: https://discord.gg/r9SBFT4
RE: CTE liner and armored transport. WIP - Galaxian - 07-14-2020
I love the Liner especially now, and can't wait to fly one
RE: CTE liner and armored transport. WIP - axisdeus - 07-14-2020
I'd consider removing the middle engines - more specifically for the liner - and place a docking port of sorts in it's place (a loading dock/ramp for the transport and maybe a shuttle bay/docking bay for the liner, with the loading ramp underneath, in the inclined area). My reason is two-fold: having the engines in the nacelles only, also having in mind is a CTE line of ships - efficiency coming to mind, so less engines maybe. In line with this, maybe two exhausts/nacelle also for the armored transport.
Looks nice, could be an entire new line of ships in the CTE category even.