Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement (/showthread.php?tid=113069) |
RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Singularity - 03-11-2014 Garrett Jax -- You earned a salute out of respect *Salute* RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Treewyrm - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 03:21 PM)Bloodl1ke Wrote:(03-11-2014, 03:02 PM)Treewyrm Wrote: Voted none. Neither variants, despite having provided feedback and ideas to two of them, are related to anything phantoms where. If someone wants etherium, revenants or whatever else - make your own bloody game assets, don't be vultures who smelled rotten corpse of a long dead faction to make a feast out of it. What I'm saying is that those unused assets should be removed, it's as simple as that. They're rubbish quality anyway. Course I remember they used to be toys of other factions before being taken away and made phantom-only, witnessed that drama too, but that doesn't matter now, does it? Rev could have some odd sinister patch-work-looking ships, a-la Reavers from Firefly and bits of matrix drones. Similarly something odd-looking for alien Eth. Current phantom ships? Fits neither. p.s. poll is rubbish and cheering "+1 honor points" crowd is full of it too. submit to poll and get a free badge, oh yeah, mhm, totally worth it. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - 7AlphaOne1 - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:46 PM)Garrett Jax Wrote: My job here is to serve the community, not try and shoehorn in an idea that the community clearly does not want, or push aside a concept that they would like better. Sir Garret Jax, the Xenomorph admin, Honorary member of the Order of Administrators , I hereby salute thee , sir. I Also hereby doth declare thee to recieve a thousand thousands , or one million respect points that thee may collect from the community at thy leisure. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - EisenSeele - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 02:52 PM)kikatsu Wrote: Why not have both? More options sounds great. Especially at this juncture, where the ships are just placeholders, there's real potential to branching out. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Garrett Jax - 03-11-2014 (03-11-2014, 04:51 PM)EisenSeele Wrote:(03-11-2014, 02:52 PM)kikatsu Wrote: Why not have both? I briefly entertained the option of combining the two ideas, however I'm afraid that it would ruin both concepts. Better to let the other one fly on its own merits. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Savas - 03-11-2014 I love you, Ser Garret. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Remnant - 03-11-2014 Garrett, I find your conclusion when faced with the feedback of the community quite admirable to say what you have about the re-write. What does this mean however, is the replacement to be put on hold until you can be given a chance to re-write some aspects? Or will something different be taking place, such as one of the alternatives. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Haste - 03-11-2014 I can't help but prefer the Etherium. While I don't really see the need to add yet another faction to this mod just to use some 'dormant' resources, it's a cool concept nonetheless. I suspect a big reason for people liking the Etherium write-up so much is just how much more detailed it is compared to the other two main contenders. It stands out because of that. RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Lythrilux - 03-11-2014 This is why we love you as an admin Garret. #GarrettJax RE: Community Poll: Phantoms Replacement - Sath - 03-11-2014 Takes some love for this community to do so.Hats off Garret. |