+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+--- Thread: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds (/showthread.php?tid=126831)
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - moebus - 03-01-2015
It's nice to have a lot of systems compared with vanilla, it makes discovery very attractive.
But at the same time, it dilutes the activity. Considering the current number of players on the server I think we should keep on reducing the number of systems.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Sylvie557 - 03-01-2015
(03-01-2015, 05:01 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote:(03-01-2015, 07:14 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: Humboldt - Removed. Fortaleza Base moved to Kansas. Ore fields moved to Vespucci.
QQ's, Can we keep the name Humboldt and remove Kansas?
But Kansas is an amazing system... Humboldt is kinda boring honestly >.>
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Stoner_Steve - 03-01-2015
(03-01-2015, 05:31 PM)Loki557 Wrote:(03-01-2015, 05:01 PM)Captain_Nemo Wrote:(03-01-2015, 07:14 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: Humboldt - Removed. Fortaleza Base moved to Kansas. Ore fields moved to Vespucci.
QQ's, Can we keep the name Humboldt and remove Kansas?
But Kansas is an amazing system... Humboldt is kinda boring honestly >.>
Humboldt, with two ore fields, pirates, and a base (both player and NPC), vs Kansas, a desolate, empty, worthless system, with a jump-gate to an alien system
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Sylvie557 - 03-01-2015
But kansas is soooo cool, plus the stuff is coming to Kansas(well at least the base although I think the ore field as well) but Humboldt just seems bland to me.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Stoner_Steve - 03-01-2015
(03-01-2015, 05:41 PM)Loki557 Wrote: But kansas is soooo cool, plus the stuff is coming to Kansas(well at least the base although I think the ore field as well) but Humboldt just seems bland to me.
(03-01-2015, 07:14 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote: Humboldt - Removed. Fortaleza Base moved to Kansas. Ore fields moved to Vespucci.
At any rate, I asked if the name could be kept at the very least
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Teerin - 03-01-2015
For those complaining about Gallia not shrinking; fear not.
Also note that changes in the rest of Sirius are not yet complete, and a few more are soon to disappear. Illinois, for example, is getting removed. Plus some Taus, possibly a Rheinland or two, etc.
The only thing I haven't seen any news about are the Hispanic systems. I'll go poke around
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Ichiru - 03-01-2015
(03-01-2015, 12:01 PM)Zayne Carrick Wrote:Quote:Sigma-15 - Formerly Luneburg. No longer a Guard system.Stop reducing Red Hessian ZoI even further!
Other than that-fine.
Ehm.. don't know what you're on about there. Luneburg is definitely not Hessian ZoI.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Sarawr!? - 03-01-2015
(03-01-2015, 01:08 PM)SpaceTime Wrote: So let me get this right.Lore in Discovery is not bound to Vanilla Freelancer, neither should it be, opening up the guard system of a faction like the Hellfire Legion serves to make them better included in the mod, and I see nothing wrong with that.
The home system of a non-vanilla (unlawful-revolutionary) faction gets mining fields and becomes the shortcut of at least 1/3 of the game's trade routes.
...Why?
So many factions in Discovery exist that did not exist in "Vanilla Freelancer", so many factions exist in Discovery that exist in a WAAAAAAAAAY different way now, then they did in "Vanilla Freelancer".
Discovery Freelancer is NOT 'Vanilla Freelancer", and it sure as heck bears little resemblance to it these days, and I'm hard pressed to believe that that's a bad thing. Discovery took Freelancer, and EXPANDED upon it, and it continues to expand and change in ways that I bet Digital Anvil never even thought Freelancer could.
I also have to wonder what you think is wrong with a faction opening itself up in a manner that makes it more inclusive and accessible?
But, can we talk about the map more, instead of focusing on something because of a specific faction?
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Fluffyball - 03-01-2015
We aren't following Vanilia Lore?
Dude, we aren't even following Discovery Lore, as every house (minus Gallia perhaps) possess no more than 10 BBs and CVs, not counting these stationary ones.
RE: Systems Update Feedback: Independent Worlds - Tarator - 03-01-2015
(03-01-2015, 11:35 PM)Toris James Gray Wrote: We aren't following Vanilia Lore?
Dude, we aren't even following Discovery Lore, as every house (minus Gallia perhaps) possess no more than 10 BBs and CVs, not counting these stationary ones.
If thats what you meant:
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=126796&highlight=census