![]() |
OWE)- - Infocard - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67) +--- Thread: OWE)- - Infocard (/showthread.php?tid=133382) |
RE: Faction pending decision - placeholder - Ace Razgriz - 11-28-2015 (11-28-2015, 11:22 PM)Outer Worlds Expedition Wrote:(11-28-2015, 11:17 PM)Bohnenquark Wrote: The Question is: what do you want to do? why dont afilliate (is it the right english word?) an existing faction? So this turned into a Unioner faction? I actually like this, gives me a reason to make a rheinland pirate now :} RE: Faction pending decision - placeholder - Wolfen - 11-28-2015 So, an Unioner faction? So be it! EDIT: Idea changed. RE: Bering Union [BU]- - Bohnenquark - 11-28-2015 Fight for an independent passage between Liberty and Rheinland (possibly for a new "independent" Jumpgate)?. why not? I'm in. RE: Faction pending decision - placeholder - Kauket - 11-28-2015 (11-28-2015, 11:23 PM)TheJarl Wrote: About the logo. The raised fist is a very very very common symbol of rebellion/revolt and has been used since forever. To think of it as copying of another faction is ridiculous, just as it is ridiculous to think of it as coming from a game. Just look at this list: i mean art wise, it's the same style of shape and the 'cuts' are the same - so it's the same vector talking law wise, this would be a copyright infringement. also the new idea is nice, but are they aware of the jumpgates collapsing? RE: Faction pending decision - placeholder - Wolfen - 11-28-2015 (11-28-2015, 11:37 PM)Nyx Wrote: also the new idea is nice, but are they aware of the jumpgates collapsing? They do. That's why they are angry in the first place, as Freeport 2 doesn't generate as much income as used to be - add up annexation by Liberty and voila. RE: Bering Union [BU]- - Bohnenquark - 11-29-2015 Isn't it a problem, that the unioners ID is hostile with the most cooperations or im i wrong? I mean, the BU is for free trading, isn't it? I wont attack the idea, i only want to understand. RE: Bering Union [BU]- - Wolfen - 11-29-2015 (11-29-2015, 12:00 AM)Bohnenquark Wrote: Isn't it a problem, that the unioners ID is hostile with the most cooperations or im i wrong? I mean, the BU is for free trading, isn't it? The NPC reputation don't need to influence PvP interactions, I believe. Like in case of the Order, despite them beiung hostile to almost all corporations, doesn't target corporated. [BU]- Bering Union or [BBU]- Bering Borderworld Union? RE: Bering Union [BU]- - Malmsteen - 11-29-2015 I think this idea have a better future now, nice work Good luck with upgrading and adding to this idea more factors so it become hard for the logical authorities to refuse it BERING UNION & Unioners ID .. hmm, interesting ! Malmsteen RE: Bering Union [BU]- - Wolfen - 11-29-2015 @Shinju Please rename account into Bering Union, as soon as the problems with accounts would be solved! ![]() RE: Bering Union [BU]- - Bohnenquark - 11-29-2015 [BU] i think.... Bering Borderworld Union sounds ..... i dont know.... Blääähhh... But you could integrate something with "independent" or "free", for example. And by the way: You should think about a new Logo :-P |