+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Battleship problem (/showthread.php?tid=2895)
Battleship problem - X-Lancer - 05-19-2007
' Wrote:An easy diagram for all to understand!
Battleship > Fighter
Battleship > Fighter x2
Battleship > Fighter x3 and 4 until you hit five then you should be able to win.
Battleship > Bomber
Battleship > (Hard fight) Bomber x2
Battleship < Bomber x3
Battleships need to be big bad MONSTERS it should take 3 cruisers not 3 fighters to bring it down. And it needs better anti fighter guns...
good diagram!!!
now..
is it Bomber=Sub in RL? more like yes in Discovery
is it fighter = Destroyer in RL? more like yes in Discovery
Battleship problem - X-Lancer - 05-19-2007
' Wrote:Well thats the only way they will be able to take you out, go in swarms. Would you rather have cap-ship whoring and have like 3 battleships and 2 Cruiser after you?
if is me..yes.. because the thing like this already happen today........and i don't care any more about that...only way can finish that problem.. find a base and dock.. and follow the 1 death rules. during PvP and dock at a base counte by 1 death,, and you are death people now, they can't attack you.......
Battleship problem - Commodore - 05-19-2007
WHO DELETE MY POST?!?
oh wait that was in the other topic
"*sits in the protection of my GB hoping it wont be nerfed and made weak*
okay come on, GBs are anti fighter, but i got attacked by 3 SA and they nearly killed me! If only my mom didnt call me off the comp, I wouldve died!and those SA were FIGHTERS!?! what kind of anti fighter is that!?! even the fuzzy thing in my avatar agrees that capships are too weak!?! or at least GBs. BSs should be slightly more powerful, cruisers should be able to destroy GBs, and swarms of GBs should be able to take a BS out, if the pilots are skilled. a BS should only be destrouctable by ether 6-7 fighters, 3-5 GBs, or 2-3 cruisers. just my opinion.
"
Battleship problem - supernova - 05-19-2007
*smiles an evil grin*
I Hacked into the forums! I am now Forum Administrator and shall control the world! (jk):lol:
Battleship problem - X-Lancer - 05-19-2007
e........what are you talking about?
Battleship problem - AdmSirRed - 05-19-2007
"Even If the pilot was SirRed ( ) 3 fighters still couldnt take out a Battleship.."
hey now lol.
even thoa bomber did some dmg on me:P
Battleship problem - Hylden - 05-19-2007
This discussion is bull****. Where ever you heard or saw that a bunch of fighters and bombers destroy a battleship?!? As someone just said, you would need 3 cruisers not 3 bombers to take a BS down. Well, btw, the capships need better anti-fighter weapons. Why is that... because in real world we can see that one damn shot from any kind of capship cuts the very best fighter to pieces. And one another thing which must be discussed. Let's take all SCIFI shows/movies we know. I am a Stargate Fan, both shows. Let's take Atlantis for a review for example. The human ship(Daedalus for the one who watch the show) cuts to shreds some hundreds of enemy fighters (wraith darts). Also, we see that if it remains without it's protective shield, it gets destroyed with 3-4 shots. Enough with Stargate. Let's take Star Trek. Their shield is named Hull Plating. In several episodes we can see that without it's hull plating, the sip get destroyed with a couple of shots.
Think about that.
Battleship problem - Panzer - 05-19-2007
Pff...
I remember the battle of Chugoku a few days ago. Damn, it was hard to hit ANYTHING in red lag, asteroids and a horde of NPCs ramming my Battlestar back and forth.
I agree, that capships NEED effective anti-fighter weapons. Specialized missle turrets, dealing little damage, but hitting about every time
It's utter nonsense for me, that something as big as a battlestar is geting owned by a bunch of flies. While originally it would literally obliterate anything stupid enough to get in weapons range It didn't have any shield, but it had a VERY thick armor. That armor could in the case of a more modern ship withstand 5 direct nuke hits. For weaponry, a battlestar could either fire accurate ship-to-ship missle (see episode "hero") or create a firewall of FLAK, setting up an impassable barrier for anything smaller. Be it a swarm of cylon raiders (typically about 300 per basestar) or nuclear missles launched by them. Speaking of which, I'd really love to see torpedos like on Starlancer, big, easy to shoot down, non-homing and hard-hitting. Naturally requiring ammmo.
Battleship problem - Dab - 05-21-2007
Can't read 50 posts..
I voted to make the BS stronger, as it needs to be.
I also voted to give fighters a chance.. BUT, that means a chance in GROUPS. Responding to the first post; 3 fighters that are well-piloted SHOULD have a chance at taking that BS, especially if they have Novas.
Battleship problem - Eppy - 05-21-2007
Dab said it first.
I wish we could make Torpedoes. Unfortunately, probably not possible. Igiss? Is this engine being evil to us again (yes)?