Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? (/showthread.php?tid=104938) |
RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - ProwlerPC - 09-19-2013 Be happy. I been screaming for a roll back to just before Doj invited that friend with the 3rd party debugger started messing around with the game. Got a player database still filled with goodies handed out by them, something this mod release doesn't fix. The mod release and any rollback concerning it's release may be in the jurisdiction of the devs but cheating and it's results are the jurisdiction of the admins. I stepped down, thankfully, but no matter how long they dragged it on I woulda still rolled everything that far back. Actually with the release of this mod being able to attract players (when stable and fixed, heh) I'd do it tommorow without any guilt. RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - sindroms - 09-19-2013 The fact that this info STILL hasn't been added to the server's MOTD troubles me. I'd be utterly peeved if something like this happened, especially when you'd need to check the forum and exactly this thread with exactly that quote about Cannon stating that the rollback MIGHT happen. That and coupled with this: [2013.09.18. 13:07:17] Sindroms (Spazzydragon): [2013.09.18. 13:07:21] Sindroms (Spazzydragon): rolbak pls [2013.09.18. 13:13:44] aerelm: not happenin (nerd) (Then again, aerelm is troll :<) Makes me wonder if that will happen at all. I and most of the people I still play with avoid the server right now just because there is no reason to dedicate your time on something that will be lost anyway. And I am pretty sure that many newcomers do the same now, waiting for the server rollback to actually start playing. So...how about less speculation and moderator orange and some admin green instead? RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - ProwlerPC - 09-19-2013 The guys I play with don't avoid the server but instead use the time for what it's intended for. They went in to sweep for mistakes and submitted their findings to the designated thread. It's far from our first mod release and we know the drill. RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - Flashâ„¢ - 09-19-2013 Don't care if its couple days rollback. Just hope its not couple months. I did acc cleaning, and if it rollback like 3-4 weeks, Im losing couple cap 8 cruisers and cloaks and about 1bill RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - sindroms - 09-19-2013 I am sure you do. The nublets on the server, especially the ones attracted by the new mod release do not. RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - Johnnie-Lapierre - 09-19-2013 @sindroms so you want not to play so you don`t loose any progress, great but if nobody will play since it is beta who will find and report bugs to the developers to be fixed? Hmmm nobody and then the rollback will come, c`mon guess it... very very late RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - Ponge - 09-19-2013 (09-16-2013, 02:45 PM)sindroms Wrote: Well, someone might argue that ANY action taken by the DPC and by extension, the Bass Hunters should be reversed. So prepare for two months just in case. In my opinion it would be best to rollback the character database to just before the patch, but rollback the player bases before the DPCs and Bass Hunters made the damage, so the inRP bases would return (like Doe Industries). Rollback - Offical Statement? - Th3Nu773r - 09-19-2013 There is a lot of speculation on the forums about a rollback but no official statement. Please can we have an official statement..... When is it likely to happen? What will happen? What will it effect. Thanks RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - Xelon - 09-19-2013 Thread merged since it's exactly the same being discussed. RE: Mandatory Beta-Rollback inbound? - Th3Nu773r - 09-19-2013 (09-19-2013, 12:45 PM)Xelon Wrote: Thread merged since it's exactly the same being discussed. Thanks |