Discovery Gaming Community
Liberty high indie capship count - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Liberty high indie capship count (/showthread.php?tid=22776)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


Liberty high indie capship count - Guest - 07-06-2009

' Wrote::mellow:

We are talking about high Liberty BC count and possible ships for other houses.

Go take your anti-independent attitude into your own independent-bashing thread. (Or one of Sindroms.)

Not that I am complaining of some retard suddenly pointing fingers at me, but since when being biased is not a part of a humans mentality?

I have nothing against independents who are not lolwutters, a matter of fact, I wish more people like the LNS-Calypso or LNS-L.Fortress showed independent capship RP which is not effected by their npc factions player factions.

Nubby, if you have anything against little ol me, take it to my PM. Not that I will waste my time in answering, but keep this kind of **** off the boards, mkay?


As said, I am an anti-idiot, not anti-indie, I will do all that is in my power to keep lolwutting caps on my side of the faction to a minimum even if it will mean submitting Cassini with Terra Haute shipyard with a minefield around it.


Liberty high indie capship count - Dusty Lens - 07-06-2009

' Wrote:Yes, I twisted your words to make this post. It suited me. Just like it would suit anyone else, any other day of the week.

n0t3d.

Also, man, the capship situation in Liberty is -so- much more mellow than it was back in the day. I should track down my old Xeno capship roster we kept for the lulz. A fair number of people have put good work into pushing a mentality of fair play into good 'ol Liberty. To be brutally honest my Xeno observation (being attacked by both sides) has the general cap population way on the unlawful side, in the form of gunboats pouring out of every orifice.

Ah here it is! The dreads can be ignored, but most everything else is what we encountered over the space of some three weeks, as memory serves. Personal encounters over three weeks. As in pew pew.

Check out the old [SA] ships for ultimate lulz.

Liberty Carriers

kanhf1326
Kay

Liberty Dreadnoughts
[SA]-LNS-Meroviginian (Richard Woolsey)
[SA]-LNS-San.Fransisco (Michael Diehardt)
[SA]-LNS-Anchorage (John Talon)
[SA]-LNS-Milwaukee (Name N/A)
LNS_Citadelle.de.Quebec (Xing)
LNS.Dave.Elliston
LPI-Rusty_Donut

Liberty Assault Battlecruisers
[SA]-LNS-Relentless (John Talon)
Stang
Liberty America
Gafwmn

Liberty Cruisers
[SA]-LNS-Mt.Blackburn (Michael Diehardt)
[SA]-LNS-Juneau (James LaBrie)
[SA]-LNS-Dallas (Greg LaCroix)
[SA]-LNS-Oklahoma (James Farley)
[SA]-LNS-Memphis (Simon Marshall)
[SA]-LNS-Arkansas (Stephanie Malaign)
GSAL-Cindy.Who
LNS_Citadelle.de.Montreal
LNS-Memphis
LNS.Echo
LNS-Lestat
LNS-Vicksburg
LNS.Auraxium
Memphis
The-Equinox
MrEagle'
Rogue_Warrior
LunaPhase_2406

Liberty Gunboats
[SA]-LNS-Luna-A (Matthew Anobi)
[SA]-LNS-Corregidor (Greg LaCroix)
[SA]-LNS-San.Diego (Stephanie)
[SA]-LNS-Novarupta (Winston)
LNS.Dave-Elliston
LNS-Fort.Blakely
LNS-Hampton.Roads
LNS-Sacramento
LNS-Las.Vegas
LNS-Atlanta
LNS_Niagara.Falls
=LSF=Maverick
=LSF=Skyshark
=LSF=Bromborough
=LSF=Lawsprite
=LSF=Point.Hope
Sgt_Burton
Jasp
Legionaire
Ranger[I]
MrEagle
Soleil_Noir

I dare say things are much more mellow now.



Liberty high indie capship count - tansytansey - 07-06-2009

Hum, interesting turn out for this thread. Though, not entirely unpredictable. Personally, I don't care how many battlecruisers there are, they're easier to kill than Gunboats and take less effort to kill than Carriers at least. I don't see why we should bicker amongst each other, when clearly the problem lies else where. I'm sure the solution doesn't lie at the bottom of a thread of flames, either.

I think a change in the way capital ships are done would be good. Nothing set in stone, because it may turn our horrible. I know n00bl3t fiercely defends his rights to freedom as an independant capital ship owner... but for as long as I've been playing discovery the system hasn't changed. If we don't explore other avenues, then things can't get better. Granted, they can't get worse either, but unless we've seen the concequences of the change, how do we know it's gonna be a bad thing? You assume the worst, and I think it's disappointing that you refuse to give your fellow community members trust, and the benefit of the doubt. You assume they're going to be eliteist pricks and say GTFO to all the independant capital ship owners. But how do we know that is the case? Things could change for the better, but unless we try, we can never know. And even if it sucks, we can always go back to the way things were.

To change takes more than to remain.


Liberty high indie capship count - MB52 - 07-06-2009

I'm insulted by the accusation that "indy" capships are the cause of all problems. Care to put some blame on the factions too? Guess not.




Liberty high indie capship count - n00bl3t - 07-07-2009

' Wrote:Rather predictable response, although I hadn't expected you to bring a thesaurus this time.
So... You're saying you're allowed to demand absolute freedom for anyone who wants it and point 'flaws' in relatively minor restrictions, accusing us of wanting absolute control, but we're not allowed to point out the major, evident and pre-existing flaws through metaphor?

[1:32:37 PM] Richard Pyle (n00bl3t) {Tumble-Weed} [Brthrn] says: Hypocrite.

No. Faction players are additionally restricted by hierarchy, peer pressure and good ol' Trial By Forum. Usually at least somebody in one of those three has at least the common sense to make sure they don't do something incredibly stupid and detrimental to 'fair play'.

You are anti-faction by the same means that you magically manage define anyone who wants even the slightest limitations to be imposed upon independents as 'anti-indie'. Despite the, once more, hypocrisy evident here, I find some humour in the fact that you need to use my full name to attempt to attain some superiority over me. And that's what we factions are attempting to do with indies, isn't it? Guess that makes you, once more, a hypocrite.

I can twist words too, as I have done here. In most circumstances I just find it to be child play, however it seems to be fitting here.

No point in using a thesaurus, but I am glad that you are incapable of properly assessing my vocabulary. It simply displays your lovely assessment skills.

I simply pointed out that you used the same metaphor that faction leaders and other people have accused the "independent side" of using, or a likewise metaphor, relating the "other side" to evil. Absolute freedom does not exist. Freedom does. You have the right to shake your fist about it, right up to my nose. That is where it stops. I am not asking for absolute freedom. I am asking that both sides obey the server rules.

Now, if you want to bring up what I said to Agmen, feel free. However, I ask you consult him first. Apart from that, you display what people accused Akumabito of doing, I believe it was called quoting out of context.

Independents get flamed more on these boards more than anyone. Simply because they have no "face". Go on, start a thread saying the independents in Rheinland are bad, start another saying [RM] is bad. See which one gets locked within five minutes.

You are anti-independent. Should I trawl through the ANZLAG chat or the Liberty Spam Chat on Skype and start quoting paragraphs of your anti-independent rants? Or would you prefer to STFU?

I used your full forum handle, because, there are many Jake's in my Skype list. I will continue to use it, because it is the name you picked for these forums. If you have a problem with that, PM Korrd and change your name instead of whinging when someone uses it, because that is something that you can do something about. (As opposed to restricting independents, something the independents cannot do something about.)

Keep twisting or STFU. Your choice.

The most important part of this, is to tell you to remove the LNS-Nebraska off your registry. Go do so. Now.

' Wrote:Not that I am complaining of some retard suddenly pointing fingers at me, but since when being biased is not a part of a humans mentality?

I have nothing against independents who are not lolwutters, a matter of fact, I wish more people like the LNS-Calypso or LNS-L.Fortress showed independent capship RP which is not effected by their npc factions player factions.

Nubby, if you have anything against little ol me, take it to my PM. Not that I will waste my time in answering, but keep this kind of **** off the boards, mkay?

As said, I am an anti-idiot, not anti-indie, I will do all that is in my power to keep lolwutting caps on my side of the faction to a minimum even if it will mean submitting Cassini with Terra Haute shipyard with a minefield around it.

Bias is a part of human mentality. I have said that before.

I was not inaccurate. Look at your threads. They all have an anti-independent undertone. Look at their frequency. They pop up all the time. It was a serious suggestion to Nathrael, to go post in one of your threads, in order to keep this one as a discussion about BC's and Siege Cruisers.

Also, no point in PM-ing you if you do not respond.


Liberty high indie capship count - tansytansey - 07-07-2009

' Wrote:I'm insulted by the accusation that "indy" capships are the cause of all problems. Care to put some blame on the factions too? Guess not.
The difference is factionalised players can, and are punished for poor behaviour. Independents can do whatever they like, with in the server rules. Unfortunately too many take that as an oppurtunity to be complete jerks about the way they play, and make the game less fun for other people. Faction members may do this sometimes too, but they can be slapped down for it.

And n00bl3t, if you plan to quote anti-indie messages from those chats, please remember to post the full context.
Finally, n00bl3t, you're making a scene. You're not going to accomplish anything this way. It's going to bounce back and forth, getting flamier and flamier until this thread gets locked.
And as I recall the LN Registry is an RP thread, and demanding to be removed from it because of an OOC reason doesn't seem right.


Liberty high indie capship count - Elvin - 07-07-2009

' Wrote:The difference is factionalised players can, and are punished for poor behaviour. Independents can do whatever they like, with in the server rules. Unfortunately too many take that as an oppurtunity to be complete jerks about the way they play, and make the game less fun for other people. Faction members may do this sometimes too, but they can be slapped down for it.

And n00bl3t, if you plan to quote anti-indie messages from those chats, please remember to post the full context.
Finally, n00bl3t, you're making a scene. You're not going to accomplish anything this way. It's going to bounce back and forth, getting flamier and flamier until this thread gets locked.
And as I recall the LN Registry is an RP thread, and demanding to be removed from it because of an OOC reason doesn't seem right.


There is no more punishment for Faction caps than for Indie ones, really.
Giving factions the power to controll capships means you point on 20 (random number, really) people, who will from now on have the right to say who is good and who is bad. No offense anyone. It's stupid. Twisted. Offensive- Based on personal grudges-favors-feelings. No thanks.

Special RP request for big ships would be nice tho, but in rough example, I don't want to get in situation when a player whom I dislike and who dislikes me get's to decide whether my RP is good and if I CAN fly what I want to fly.

Not only faction-caps owners RP, and not only indies do the lolwuting.

So again, special RP requests. At least for BSes if nothing else... But even for cruisers it would be fine, after all, majority, no, almost all of peopel in sirius do not get to fly capital ships, yet in our space, thigs that fly are actually 40-60% capital ships... No good.


Liberty high indie capship count - n00bl3t - 07-07-2009

' Wrote:And n00bl3t, if you plan to quote anti-indie messages from those chats, please remember to post the full context.
Finally, n00bl3t, you're making a scene. You're not going to accomplish anything this way. It's going to bounce back and forth, getting flamier and flamier until this thread gets locked.
And as I recall the LN Registry is an RP thread, and demanding to be removed from it because of an OOC reason doesn't seem right.

Noted

I will, if he wants me too.

I made my original post, to which JakeSG felt he had to reply. My original post was telling Nathrael that this was the wrong thread, albeit in a slightly hostile way. As I said in my last post, it is JakeSG's choice whether to shut up or not.

I am asking it be removed. It is about whether he has the decency to remove it. There is already an RP reason to remove it, however, that will be kept quiet about now, since I want to wait and see whether he will do the right thing and remove the ship from the list.

Edit: As to your non-aimed message, there is a response above which I made that covers it.


Liberty high indie capship count - Cellulanus - 07-07-2009

'Tis not the caps classification, but how thou doth use it.


But seriously, house caps are fine where they are in my opinion.


Liberty high indie capship count - tansytansey - 07-07-2009

' Wrote:There is no more punishment for Faction caps than for Indie ones, really.
Giving factions the power to controll capships means you point on 20 (random number, really) people, who will from now on have the right to say who is good and who is bad. No offense anyone. It's stupid. Twisted. Offensive- Based on personal grudges-favors-feelings. No thanks.

Special RP request for big ships would be nice tho, but in rough example, I don't want to get in situation when a player whom I dislike and who dislikes me get's to decide whether my RP is good and if I CAN fly what I want to fly.

Not only faction-caps owners RP, and not only indies do the lolwuting.

So again, special RP requests. At least for BSes if nothing else... But even for cruisers it would be fine, after all, majority, no, almost all of peopel in sirius do not get to fly capital ships, yet in our space, thigs that fly are actually 40-60% capital ships... No good.

For the record, I don't believe giving factions control of battleships will solve anything. I am, however, open to the idea of change, and it is certainly an option I am willing to trial, especially since Special RP requests put more strain on the Admins. If it turns out worse than the current situation, we can always go back, right? No harm in trying.
After all, if we don't try to actively solve the problem, then we haven't the right to complain about it.

As for "Not only faction-caps owners RP, and not only indies do the lolwuting." this is true. However, if you see a faction member 'lolwutting' then you can contact the appropriate faction leaders to resolve the issue. I encourage anyone who feels the behaviour of any LR- member they encounter is sub-standard to contact me in regards to it.

' Wrote:'Tis not the caps classification, but how thou doth use it.
So true, and to be honest, Light Fighters scare me more than Carriers.